9/11 pager messages released on Wikileaks

Associate
Joined
9 Jun 2009
Posts
1,804
Location
London
Text pagers are usually carried by persons operating in an official capacity. Messages in the archive range from Pentagon and New York Police Department exchanges, to computers reporting faults to their operators as the World Trade Center collapsed.

The archive is a completely objective record of the defining moment of our time. We hope that its revelation will lead to a more nuanced understanding of the event and its tragic consequences.

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/11/25/911_pager_wikileaks/

http://www.reddit.com/r/reddit.com/comments/a7xpt/conspiracy_theories_commence_wikileaks_to_release/

Not sure what to make of it, but some of the messages are quite touching.

2001-09-11 09:52:02 Metrocall {1175659} 1 2400 Frm: MSN Txt: Kavitha Sunand Nair: bomb was diffused at the heliport at pentagon. white house and pentagon being emptied.....

What is that about :/

Conspiracy fanatics are going to go crazy about this
 
I believe it is, but then maybe the hours and hours of "loose change" has brainwashed me with facts.



2001-09-11 08:48:24 Arch [1072988] D ALPHA Sanchez Maggie M|I love you, have a really good day...yeppie I get to watch women pee




:confused::confused::confused:
 
Just declaring that i don't believe in the 9/11 was an inside job crap. So don't drag me into it.
orlytg.jpg


Thermite + fuel = extreme heat, melts through nearly any metal know to man, if your wiring the building, you just need to put some at certain points around the central column (strongest point) to make the building enough to weaken. The demolition was mainly from the bottom, hence people explaining they heard explosions at the bottom of the towers, plus CNN news reporting it. So plane packed with fuel, igniting the thermite, weakening the central column and explosions at the base around the supporting columns, should be enough to bring the towers down.

Placing demolitions at the base of the central columns wouldn't bring much attention at all, considering its underground and out of the way.

Oh and since your going the demolitions route, how do you explain the fact that not only did the building fall in under 8 secs (something to do with mavity proving it had no resistance) and in a very neat pile? Surely if it was blown up by planes and fuel the building would be spread over a much wider area.

Also i'm guessing you haven't seen the video of Bin Laden claiming he never did the attacks on the tower and in fact said that the Americans should look inside there own government for the reason of the attack.

The impossible flight maneuvers come from the reported paths the planes took when turning around, which aviation experts have claimed is nearly impossible based on the wings being ripped off and them having extremely limited knowledge of flying planes.

Planes slamming into a building puts impact pressure which is over a short period of time, wind impact depending on the speed is a constant pressure, meaning it creates a rocking effect on the building making it sway.

The calling of the guards away shows that there was prior warning of an attack, the fact that they didn't bother clearing the building shows the knowledge wasn't wide spread.

You say people would notice setting up demolition? How would they notice? If some guy is deep inside a wall, unless they can see through walls your not going to see what there doing.

Again i keep stating this but you keep ignoring it, if this theory is so false, why is so many Americans believing that the official story is lies and why is more professionals putting there reputations on the line to prove it wrong?

And this is nothing like UFO's this isn't fantasy, it would be if you believed the official story, but a lot of people don't.

As for insulting you, your taking the same approach as most people, not open to any type of possible alternate theory, rather believe what your spoon fed by the media.
 
Conspiracy fanatics are going to go crazy about this

I keep a copy of the Daily Mail from the day after 9/11, looking back it was not until a few weeks after that the confusion about what had happened started to clear up. It was clearly a conspiracy, a conspiracy to hijack a load of planes to kill as many people as posibile.
 
What is that about :/

Conspiracy fanatics are going to go crazy about this

Theres gonna be a lot of confusion on the day of an event like that - people spreading what they think to be good information when its actually someone mis-understanding events or adding some flavor of their own.
 
Theres gonna be a lot of confusion on the day of an event like that - people spreading what they think to be good information when its actually someone mis-understanding events or adding some flavor of their own.

Too right, its all just a load of babel, the messages before the incident are more intresting I feel.
 
I guess. There's nothing to make up though as it's just messages from normal people and computers talking D:
 
2001-09-11 10:05:12 Skytel {1080153} 1 1200 NATIONAL ALERT >> Keith, we are under a national alert with major plane crashes.. you r wife has called & is upset... as is everyone else here . NAncy.

:(
 
2001-09-11 10:09:12 Virgin Celll {131231231} 1 1200 NATIONAL ALERT >> Planes did not hit the twin towers. Was *CERTAINLY* a nuclear weapon that was launched, but thankfully the warehead didn't go off. Luckily chuck norris saved us. DA

:p
 
why would they leak this info? its private thoughts sigh... wouldnt this rake up emotions of those who lost loved ones? Why make public private and very personal messages? Why? i dont get it - dont think i ever will.
 
why would they leak this info? its private thoughts sigh... wouldnt this rake up emotions of those who lost loved ones? Why make public private and very personal messages? Why? i dont get it - dont think i ever will.
The primary argument for the release is that it contributes to creating a full historical record of the events.

That said I can't help thinking some of the people involved in the leak — either the individual who is the source of the leak, or those including WikiLeaks who have facilitated it — have ulterior motives, possibly related to conspiracy theories.
 
Back
Top Bottom