9/11 : The Pentagon Crash

johnson

johnson

johnson

Permabanned
Joined
12 Apr 2006
Posts
221
What are all your opinions on this? I was cloudy about it before all these videos came out but have a look at this one.

http://www.dump.com/links.php?link=1157235&a=1&b=1&c=2&o=popular&p=1&r=all

The only proof of it actually happening are all the victims from the plane. It really does seem like a small explosion for such a big aircraft crashing in at such a speed with THAT amount of fuel on board.
 
Last edited:
So if it wasn't a plane then what did hit it? Also didn't they released the full video of those 5 photos of the impact which plainly showed the airplane

edit: this video makes more sense to me
 
Last edited:
didn't you know it's the law of OCUK?

No matter what you post your thread about some gimp (not actually GIMP, he's quite nice :p) will come along and say 'oh seen it, done it, posted it three years ago)

Don't worry about it, it comes to anyone brave enough to make a thread these days.

I think it's quite interesting, you might like this if you haven't seen it

Loose Change

it's about 1hr21, but it's a good watch whether you believe in the theories or not.
 
I dont buy a lot of the bull about the attacks but this video does raise a few questions that provoke some thought.

The plane that hit the pentagon was loaded with fuel yet official pictures show offices barely even disturbed and certainly not fire damaged.... so how exactly did this area not burst into flames like the towers did? magic?

And of course the only true evidence to show what really hit it ( the gas station video from across the road ) was taken by officials and vanished. This has been verified and to me is THE most simple evidence to show that the FBI are hiding something, because if they arent they would just show a frame of two from that vid and end all the speculation.

At the end of they day i dont for one minute beleive that goverments and agencies such as the FBI and CIA are honest and truthful. They do what they want to and can hide what they like. So we will probably never know the exact details of that day.
 
I know some very dark secrets, it was a UFO apparently, the CIA and US military covered all the evidence, that plane that was hijacked never existed and was just a coverup for an attempted alien invasion.
 
People say "ooh but the damage was too small to have been done by a plane"....

erm, this is the pentagon we're talking about? Surely a building of that stature is going to be built pretty damn strong?
 
So the fact the actual plane that hit the pentagon being destroyed and not existing now and the pilot crew passengers etc. doesn't mean anything.
I watched a video about it and they said is was a missile but what proof do they have of that? and who fired that missle as i dont think terrorists are able to get hold of one in america
 
AtreuS said:
And of course the only true evidence to show what really hit it ( the gas station video from across the road ) was taken by officials and vanished. This has been verified and to me is THE most simple evidence to show that the FBI are hiding something, because if they arent they would just show a frame of two from that vid and end all the speculation.
Click to expand...

The only explanation I can offer for this is that it sets a precident. Theres a whole lot of things that, for very good reasons, they'd rather not release a few frames from. While the pentagon incident may well be innocuous, it takes government secrets down a route they'd rather not go.

/devil's advocate
 
greenlizard0 said:
People say "ooh but the damage was too small to have been done by a plane"....

erm, this is the pentagon we're talking about? Surely a building of that stature is going to be built pretty damn strong?
Click to expand...

Not really... you can see the constuction from the photos... its not exactly 60ft of solid steel or anything. Yes its strong and would have been a lot more solid than the towers but the big question for me is the fire damage. Where is it? for that much fuel in a plane to burn you would see far more damage than on the photos. Which means 2 things.... either the plane didnt have much fuel on board, or it wasnt the plane it was supposed to be. This plane had supposedly taken off not long before and was going trans-atlantic so had a full fuel load.

I did some work training at BaE when i was in school and saw quite a lot of stuff about crashes ( i was in the R&D dept so they had to reserach crashes and stuff to make sure the same thing wouldnt happen to their products ) and these pictures simply dont look right. Not for a full fuel load on a passanger jet. Those rooms would have been in flames for at least an hour, yet u can see books, filing cabinets and even a pc monitor still standing normally and un touched!

"I smell something fishy, and im not talking about the contents of Baldrics apple crumble!"
 
Last edited:
The plane that hit the Pentagon is only the second plane in history to disintegrate so badly on impact leaving so little evidence of its existence.

The first?? One of the planes that went into the towers!
 
Posty said:
and who fired that missle as i dont think terrorists are able to get hold of one in america
Click to expand...
Many (as in, the people who believe it was a missle) reckon that America fired it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom