• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

939 3800+ v 4200+

I know the 4200 is 200mhz faster, but is it worth the extra £20?
Put simply, no.
I agree :)

The X2 4200+ may be better for people who have limited overclocking options or are restricted by their hardware in some way. If you got a half decent socket 939 (NF4) that can run up to 300MHz-FSB, Ram that can either run at a fast speed 'or' works well on a divider then you can really get a lot out of the regular X2 3800+

I'd rather have the cheaper chip *and* a premium HSF over the more expensive chip running stock cooling!
 
Interesting thread,

If the 3800 x2 can get to 2.6 on stock voltages, what can the 4200 x2 usually clock to on normal voltages?
Usually about the same. The two chips are exactly the same core, but the 3800+ has a 10x locked multiplier whilst the 4200+ has an 11x locked multiplier.

So the overclocking potential of the two chips at stock voltage is exactly the same. What could limit it is the fact that with the 3800+, the FSB will have to be higher to make up for the lower multiplier. This means the motherboard has to be stable at a higher FSB. It also makes the Northbridge, PWMICs and MOSFETs run hotter ;)

Jon
 
Back
Top Bottom