Associate
That sounds like Electronic brakeforce distribution in cars, its genius![]()
Yea but braking doesn't make you move faster or fluently
![Stick Out Tongue :p :p](/styles/default/xenforo/vbSmilies/Normal/tongue.gif)
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
That sounds like Electronic brakeforce distribution in cars, its genius![]()
Apparently, according to Techpowerup, reviewers got their ROP count based on a non-public document NVIDIA circulated to the media before the 970/980 were launched. That document shows 60 ROPS for both cards with no mention of whether they were all active or not on the 970 so the media assumed they were.
adverts for the GTX 970 (and some reviews) were saying this card is suitable for gaming at 4k - its now the green team fangirls are saying its a mid range (yes really) card and doesn't play at 4k
review sites is how the bulk of people buy video cards - `oooh shiny GTX 970 ultra uber edition scores well at 4k` - here ocuk take my £500....
and
http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/MSI/GTX_970_Gaming/20.html
seems TPU seem to find cards right now that can game at 4k quite well thank you
oh and
http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/MSI/GTX_970_Gaming/12.html
that's 60fps at 4k....
Why chuck in childish comments like "fangirls"? Really not needed.
got to feel for ocuk, they must be getting a lot of calls from irate people and its not realy there fault is it
You're doing it wrong: you should be going AMD (or pre-owned Nvidia at the very least!) at this point instead of giving Nvidia more of your money. If they don't loose customers due to their questionable business ethics they won't learn and stop being greedy shady see-you-next-Tuesdays!
So you still want to give Nvidia your money.![]()
knickers in a twist over this for one..... and screaming matches over FCAT and AMD.... which I do recall you did have an opinion about![]()
Apparently, according to Techpowerup, reviewers got their ROP count based on a non-public document NVIDIA circulated to the media before the 970/980 were launched. That document shows 60 ROPS for both cards with no mention of whether they were all active or not on the 970 so the media assumed they were.
But I don't stoop to childish name calling. Everyone has an opinion of which I respect and regardless of me agreeing with that opinion or not, there is no need for that kind of pettiness. Grow up.
The same reason the 1792 930Mhz Shader 256Bit R9 285 is sometimes faster than the 2048 1050Mhz Shader 384Bit R9 280X.
Texture compression.
But I don't stoop to childish name calling. Everyone has an opinion of which I respect and regardless of me agreeing with that opinion or not, there is no need for that kind of pettiness. Grow up.
Just so the plot thickens, I would like if possible for Kaapstaad and Gregster to state if
a - in any way related to Nvidia as shareholders or employees or have stocks
b - in any way related to OCUK as shareholders or employees
j/k
There is not a GPU that has been released and their won't be in the next two generations that is suitable for playing @4K, at the moment you need a minimum of 3 GPUs and the VRAM to back it up.
Review sites can say what they like as they do their testing on reduced settings @4K but at the moment there are no GPUs capable.![]()
Just so the plot thickens, I would like if possible for Kaapstaad and Gregster to state if
a - in any way related to Nvidia as shareholders or employees or have stocks
b - in any way related to OCUK as shareholders or employees
j/k
Exactly. I got my 3 GTX 970 assuming they had real 4GB full accessible Vram and no slowdowns for 4K. Now it turns out they're just 3.5GB and I feel 3 times screwed over.