Associate
I'm not sure if I can make this comprehendible since I'm no expert myself, but I've a few questions about LCDs and google just won't spill the beans.
As I understand it interpolation is just a fact of life if you're going to use an LCD at a non-native resolution. Running my current 17" at anything other than 1280*1024 makes me want to get my eyes checked.
But what I'm wondering is does the change in aspect ratio matter as much (or more) than the change in resolution.
For example: a 1280*1024(5:4) monitor shows some interp when displaying at 1280*960(4:3)
Does a 1600*1200(4:3) monitor displaying 1280*960(4:3) show less interp, since the interpolation is linear, with the same aspect ratio?
What about a widescreen(1680*1050,16:10) displaying a lower res?
And finally is there enough of a difference to justify getting a 20.1"?
As I understand it interpolation is just a fact of life if you're going to use an LCD at a non-native resolution. Running my current 17" at anything other than 1280*1024 makes me want to get my eyes checked.
But what I'm wondering is does the change in aspect ratio matter as much (or more) than the change in resolution.
For example: a 1280*1024(5:4) monitor shows some interp when displaying at 1280*960(4:3)
Does a 1600*1200(4:3) monitor displaying 1280*960(4:3) show less interp, since the interpolation is linear, with the same aspect ratio?
What about a widescreen(1680*1050,16:10) displaying a lower res?
And finally is there enough of a difference to justify getting a 20.1"?