• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

About to buy Sapphire HD4890 Vapor-X 2GB...with x4 PCIe slot. Need some confirmation

Associate
Joined
28 Jul 2008
Posts
52
Thanks for taking the time.

I'm about to buy a Sapphire ATI Radeon HD 4890 Vapor-X 2048MB GDDR5 PCI-Express Graphics Card

It'll run on a crossover board, the ASrock 4core dual SATA-2. I didn't want to dispose of my current AGP Sapphire X1950 pro at the time of purchase a year ago, even now it's still capable of running the latest games on high settings, or rather it was until it packed up recently.

Now I see my folly though, as checking the benchmark results for Pci-e 1.0 x4, x8, and x16 posted on another site, the overall conclusion seems to be x16 is always worth paying for, x8 isn't that far behind, but x4 really is much slower...

So the questions are, what sort of framerates do you think I can get with this awesome card being hobbled by x4 pci-e 1.0?

I want to play large battles of Empire Total War on the highest settings in smoothness, do you think I could do this with the support of an Intel core-2 2.3GHz, and 2x500mb of DDR1? I'll upgrade my motherboard when I can afford to upgrade the RAM as well, I'd just like some predictions of what speeds I could get before I do.

Thanks then.
 
Last edited:
Yes 1GB DDR1. I forgot to mention above that the motherboard can only run a maximum of x4 pci-e.

Actually reflux, that was the other issue. As you say, the benchmarking results showed no more than a 1 framerate difference between the 1GB and 2GB versions below that resolution, and I'm happy with my 1680x1050 on a 22'' flat-screen, I just figured that the 2GB version of this card was only £30 more than and might offer some future-proofing. Can you foresee any other reason that the extra GB may come in handy in the future?

Also, even if my bandwidth is totally bottlenecked by this card, I don't see why I shouldn't get the card first and upgrade the rest later, so I can play games now, it should only be a couple of months down the line when I do, this card would probably still be my choice if I waited, it's f'ing flawless.
 
Last edited:
As I'm sure you can tell, I'm someone that only ever learns about hardware when it's faulty or insufficient. I've only just got back into my gaming after a couple of years off, and honestly wasn't aware that 1GB DDR1 was so dated now.

OK, on the one hand, I can't play games until I get a new card, on the other, the card is wasted on this system, and more importantly, dates much quicker than other hardware. So it all comes down to how soon I could afford to upgrade the RAM and motherboard, I'll have a think about my finances.

Thanks then, I feel slightly less profoundly ignorant. :)
 
It is a socket 775. OK, I've ruled out getting that card right now. I then considered getting a new i7 mobo, DDR3 RAM and that card, but I will need a second pc sooner or later for when I move out. I'd like to leave this pc here, that would be moderately powerful at gaming, and when I have the cash, buy or build a gaming monster for a primary pc to take away with me.

So upgrading this for competent performance on high-end games with value as the main concern seems to be the best option for now. This mobo may only have x4 PCI-e, but I'm guessing a pretty powerful Radeon, such as a 4850, as Zarf suggests, combined with some now shockingly cheap 2x2GB DDR2 and my current core-2 2.13GHz would offer a fantastic gaming performance/price ratio.

Thanks guys, there were several options, and you've helped me see this as the best one.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom