Admit Fault = Void Insurance?

LiE

LiE

Caporegime
Joined
2 Aug 2005
Posts
26,276
Location
Milton Keynes
If you admit you are 100% at fault in a car accident will this void your insurance? I was informed that on some policies this is the case? Cheers
 
If you admit you are 100% at fault in a car accident will this void your insurance? I was informed that on some policies this is the case? Cheers

I think you are not suppose to say anything apart from give your insurance and contact details and the insurance company are suppose to act on your behalf.

Admitting liability when you know sod all on road traffic law means you give the insurance company little option but to simply pay out - something they won't want to do.
 
Basically my brother just had an accident. It's his first year of driving and he's taken a roundabout too fast and hit 2 cars in the process.
 
Your insurance company tells you not to admit liability.

I cannot imagine a court in the land accepting that an insurer was right to void a policy after you admitted liability for a blatant fault claim.
 
[TW]Fox;17145451 said:
Your insurance company tells you not to admit liability.

I cannot imagine a court in the land accepting that an insurer was right to void a policy after you admitted liability for a blatant fault claim.

No, but they could (and have) accepted that an insurer was right to void a policy after you admitted fault for something that actually wasn't... which is where the confusion comes from, and where the instruction not to admit liability comes from.
 
No, but they could (and have) accepted that an insurer was right to void a policy after you admitted fault for something that actually wasn't... which is where the confusion comes from, and where the instruction not to admit liability comes from.

Absolutely, by this doesn't seem like the case for the OP.
 
[TW]Fox;17145451 said:
Your insurance company tells you not to admit liability.

I cannot imagine a court in the land accepting that an insurer was right to void a policy after you admitted liability for a blatant fault claim.

So in this instance it's best for him to admit fault or simply inform his insurer and let them decide?


Well done :rolleyes:

I know, he's a complete idiot.
 
Thanks, I've passed on the advice.

Hopefully he will learn from this, his excess and increased premiums are going to rape him.
 
Even if he has admitted it at the time it means nothing, he was obviously in shock after the accident.
 
Tell the insurer you* admit fault, it'll make things smoother.

* - oh, sorry, your brother.

The majority of the people in this thread seem to suggest against this? I've told my brother to report the accident and give details and let the rest be taken care of.

Not sure why 'your brother' is highlighted?
 
Have you read the thread? By giving a truthful account of the incident the insurers will take care of the rest.
 
Basically my brother just had an accident. It's his first year of driving and he's taken a roundabout too fast and hit 2 cars in the process.

He was on the roundabout first therefore speeding or not he is not fully to blame. The other partys should be watching from the right, thats pretty much all you have to do bar the odd look to the left to ensure some idiot is about to pull out into the side of you.

Andy
 
general conditions of most insurance companies advise that they have the right to stop the insurance if you admit liability at the scene of a bump, just give you name, number is optional, your insurance company and leave them deal with it, the reason they tell you not to admit anything is that as mention if someone is in shock and they say it was their fault then the insurance company *depending on other information independant witnesses etc* dont have much choice but to pay out
 
Last edited:
Doesnt matter if you admit liability or not, insurance companies primary blanket answer is "not our clients fault" regardless of how clear cut it is or what was said at the scene.
 
Back
Top Bottom