After the most stable adsl wireless router

Associate
Joined
18 Sep 2003
Posts
2,368
Hi, what is considered the most relaible and stable adsl router out there? I need a rock solid router both wired and wireless. In the past I have only really had experience with cheap routers, I've heard good things about netgear and us robotics what routers are people using for stability?
 
As above - if you want the most reliable and stable - then the only way to go is Cisco. You'll be looking at upwards of £250. Something like the Cisco 857W or 877W would be what you are after.

Alternatively the next drop down the scale would be either something like a Draytek Vigor 2800G (just got one of these myself) or a Zyxel Prestige 662HW - you are looking at £130-150 for these.

Next up would be something like the Linksys WAG54GX2 (very good - I also have one of these which has just been replaced by the Draytek due to a couple of extra features I will be needing), Netgear DG834G (not the GT or PN versions), or Zyxel 660HW - you are looking at around £60-£100 for these.

If you want reliability avoid any cheap no name routers and IMO avoid Belkin kit.

Best advice if you want solid wireless is to avoid all the proprietry "super-g" type solutions and stick to standard 802.11g/b. The only "super-g" type technology I have ever had any success with is the Airgo True MIMO as seen in the Linksys WAG54GX2.
 
sl33pyhead said:
Next up would be something like the Linksys WAG54GX2 (very good - I also have one of these which has just been replaced by the Draytek due to a couple of extra features I will be needing), Netgear DG834G (not the GT or PN versions), or Zyxel 660HW - you are looking at around £60-£100 for these.

I'd never touch Linksys ADSL kit after seeing how varied it is.

Netgear stuff is also exceedingly poor, as well as Zyxel.

Most consumer routers are generally useless.
 
tolien said:
The Zyxel 660HW is pretty crappy too.

Yeah I'd avoid Zyxel at all costs, they are extremely crap. They offer advanced features, but have some savere and yet simple problems, enough that I would never use one and I can have them for free.

I'd also avoid belkin, having had problems with their routers (overheating then dropping the connection). Linksys, so far for me has always been solid.

Just ensure you don't get Zyxel!
 
ecksmen said:
Yeah I'd avoid Zyxel at all costs, they are extremely crap. They offer advanced features, but have some savere and yet simple problems, enough that I would never use one and I can have them for free.

I'd also avoid belkin, having had problems with their routers (overheating then dropping the connection). Linksys, so far for me has always been solid.

Just ensure you don't get Zyxel!
I'd disagree - from experience mosy Zyxel's have been pretty good - especially the 662HW.

Funny how peoples experience varys so wildy with similar kit.
 
tolien said:
Yup, but the 660HW is worse still.
What problems have you had or heard about with them? I know originally the firmware was a little flakey but they're pretty mature now. Mind you apparently none of the Zyxel kit are great ADSL2+ performers from what I have heard.
 
tolien said:
Instability running QoS for one.
Ah. Ok. Never heavily used it so I can't really comment although it did appear to work from the little time I played about with it on a 662HW.
Mind you considering the 660HW's price range it is perhaps not suprising to not have stable QoS support.
 
Plus the fact that it couldn't do Multi-NAT if you had an ISP using IP Unnumbered, and that it has huge problems with SIP traffic.
 
sl33pyhead said:
I'd disagree - from experience mosy Zyxel's have been pretty good - especially the 662HW.

Funny how peoples experience varys so wildy with similar kit.

Well, TBH I only see the bad side (working for tech support, supporting zyxel equipment) and they have never impressed me. Admittedly I have no reall handson experience with that model, but with a lot of others and they all seem so so. Like I said before I'll never use one. Each to their own and all. ;)
 
Thanks for all the input. I should have made it clear that am after a non commercial product and would be willing to spend at the most £100. Is there any agreement on which of the popular routers seem to be the most stable?
 
player said:
Thanks for all the input. I should have made it clear that am after a non commercial product and would be willing to spend at the most £100. Is there any agreement on which of the popular routers seem to be the most stable?
For that price range I'd say take your pick from the Linksys WAG54GX2, WAG354G, or the Netgear DG834 (not the GT or PN versions).
 
I've had awesome stability from 3Com routers. The one running in my mates' uni house is one that has been running 24/7 for about 3 years, with both the LAN and cable connection getting hammered. Number of crashes = 0.

Suman
 
My run of the mill BT Voyager 2110 just keeps on running. Don't know I've got it really. I don't think they are very dear either.
 
Back
Top Bottom