Alisher Usmanov's letter to the Arsenal board

Soldato
Joined
7 Apr 2008
Posts
24,652
Location
Lorville - Hurston
That Usmanov letter is damning!!

In so many words, he is blatantly accusing the Arsenal board of greed. They own shares in the club and the more money in the coffers, the greater their share value. Just looking out for themselves and he 100% correct imo.

This is the full text. It's very rare you see such public slamming between shareholders.

Dear Sirs,
In recent weeks a couple of separate actions have occurred, which have caused us, as a near 30% shareholder in the Club, to have serious concerns about the approach of the Board and the management team:

• Firstly, there were some very deliberate and public comments by Ivan Gazidis which were intended to leave the Club's supporters with an impression that Red & White is in some bitter stand-off with the Board over its desire for a Board seat and that our involvement on the Club's Board might cause conflict and "destabilize" the Club; and

• Secondly, OJSC MegaFon (Russia) received a cold call letter from Mr Gazidis requesting a meeting to discuss a possible international partnership deal including shirt sponsorship. MegaFon is one of the three largest mobile phone companies in Russia and also happens to be over 50% owned by Alisher Usmanov. Is this really the level of professionalism that is being applied to securing long-term commercial contracts?

Let us not forget that we have invested circa £200 million of cash in the equity of the Club. We are part of this Club and naturally want the best for it, but our investment is less important than the fact that we are loyal supporters and will never do anything that would destabilize or "create conflict" at the Club.

We do however believe that you, the Board, and the executive management team should focus your energies on the most efficient operation of the Club and desist from seeking to create a false enemy in Red & White. In our view it is clear that you are trying to distract attention from the more fundamental issues facing the Club, and which indeed many of the supporters discuss through social media sites and other forums on a regular basis. These are the financial model, the lack of investment and the Club's future strategic direction.

However, before addressing these points, it is important to deal with the issues surrounding a Board seat for Red & White once and for all. As you all know well, Mr Usmanov has never sought for himself a Board seat at the Club. Indeed Mr Usmanov does not hold any board seat in any of the companies where he is an investor. Since the purchase of our first share in the Club, we have not only steadfastly adhered to a policy of non-interference in the running of the Club, but have consistently supported the management and given no reason whatsoever to be accused of subversion or sabotage. The history of our voting in support of the Board at the annual general meetings is proof of this.

Indeed, in any conversation about conflict, it is clear from a look at the history of the Club in recent years that the Board has achieved conflict without the help of any outside parties, notably the acrimonious departures of David Dein, Keith Edelman, Lady Nina Bracewell-Smith and Richard Carr, who then reappeared on the Football Club Board. You also instituted a lock-down agreement originally to prevent Mr Kroenke from gaining control and then, later, to exclude our involvement even though there were no grounds or need to do so.
The real conflict seems to be between the supporters' expectations and your vision for the Club and at the heart of this is the policy of so-called self-financing. The self-financing model was created to suit the major shareholders at the time, all of whom subsequently sold their shares.

The previous decision by the Board to fund the building of the Emirates Stadium with long-term debt was, we believe, certainly not about self-financing. If it had been, it would have been funded through a mixture of debt and non-dividend equity. Instead it allowed, in our view, the major shareholders of the time, who happened to all be Board directors, to load the Club with a liability, to benefit from increased future revenue streams and consequent increase in the value of their holdings, whilst avoiding dilution of their equity. The Board of the time then appeared to pursue a policy of increasing ticket prices and squeezing the fans to cover the short term cost increases which allowed them to bridge until all of these shareholders and Board directors sold 100% of their holdings and cashed out at vast profits.

This policy does not seem to have changed. We have sought and been refused any meetings with Mr Kroenke despite the fact that we own almost 30% of the Club or to put another way almost 1 in every 3 seats in the stadium. It is clear that our stated policy for the major shareholders, namely Mr Kroenke and ourselves, to inject non-dividend paying equity into the Club by way of a rights issue to reduce the debt and invest in the future is of no interest to the Board. Mr Kroenke was sold a vision by the Board at the time that the Club could be successful without further investment, so he is pursuing a similar policy which is to run the Club without any investment and to avoid any dilution of his equity, a good part of which was funded by a loan from Deutsche Bank AG to KSE, UK, Inc. at the time of the mandatory offer. The status of that loan and whether it is still outstanding has not been clarified by Mr Kroenke.

As a consequence of this policy, which is dressed up as prudent financial planning, it is down to our manager, and not the shareholders, to have to deal with the Club's tight finances, carry the burden of repaying the stadium debt by selling his best players and having to continue to find cheaper replacements. All of that, naturally, comes at the expense of performance on the pitch.
This policy is leading to the loss of our best players, often to our main competitors, and even causes the players themselves to question their future at the Club and the Club's ambitions. The situation with our captain and outstanding performer from last season Robin van Persie sums this up. Yet again we are faced with losing our true marquee player at the Club because we cannot assure him of the future direction and give confidence that we can win trophies. Where are the safeguards to ensure that this doesn't happen again and again in the future? As a top Club we should, at the very least, match if not beat the offers that other clubs make to try and lure our very best players away, and also provide a more compelling vision of the future. You can try and put a good face on a bad game for as long as you want, pontificating about the merits of this model, but it will not hide the obvious fact that it just does not allow our great manager to fully realize his managerial talent and deliver success for the fans who are paying the highest prices in the land. It appears that a place in the Champions League will be the pinnacle of our ambition again next season. Unfortunately, in the future we may see this ambition lowered further. It doesn't help to turn a blind eye to the reality of the situation and keep thinking of ourselves as being in the same league as Real Madrid, Chelsea, Manchester City and Barcelona. To have a fighting chance of success, which means winning trophies, we need to match them in every aspect, including, if not first and foremost, financial.

So what is Red & White's vision for the Club? It is simple. A debt free Club, with a big enough war chest to buy top talent players who can hit the ground running and who can complement the Club's long tradition of developing young players and homegrown talent. Together they can help the Club win the most prestigious trophies - because it is the trophies which are the crowning achievement for everybody at the Club. The trophies are also key to the commercial success of the Club - they increase the value of the players, the value of the brand, attract the best sponsors and maximize the value of our commercial contracts which should in turn mean that the Club does not have to squeeze any more income from hard pressed fans. We also believe in the transparency that a stock market listing brings so are committed to the Club remaining listed on the stock exchange and to greater fan involvement both through share ownership and also Board representation for the fans.

Today we wish the majority shareholder Mr Kroenke every success in running the Club, even though we have deep reservations about the viability of the policies being pursued by his management team and sanctioned by the Board.

Finally and reflecting our long-term commitment to the Club, we will continue to purchase more shares in the Club from anyone who wants to sell them to us. Also in order to formalize our long-term involvement with the Club and put an end to any speculation over our position, we, as the co-owners of Red &White, will proudly retain our holding in the Club as a long-term investment for ourselves and our family members to benefit for generations to come. We want the absolute best for the Club and will do what is necessary to ensure the success of the Club that we all love.
Yours sincerely,

Alisher Usmanov
Farhad Moshiri


Great letter. They need to be embarrassed into action or Arsenal will decline further.
.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/18725835
 
stadium yes but squad? our squad from last season was weaker then spurs and liverpool if u was to compare like for like for each squad member.

Only thanks to redknapp and dalglish being **** managers compared to wenger was the reason why both clubs did nto finish above us. no one is envous of our squad
 
'Full of average players'... but he's managed to retain Champions League football for a long time...

How bad must Newcastle/Everton/Liverpool/Tottenham be? :eek: :p

very bad indeed. wenger is not the issue because if he was, he would be no better then harry rednkappp and dalglish yet wenger finished above those two with a weaker team.
i dont know what DM is smoking my constantly blaming wenger
 
If funds genuinely aren't being made available (as the letter alludes to) then how can Wenger be to blame. He didn't have a problem spending decent money a few years ago. The bottom line is we are selling all our best players, not replacing them suitably and banking the majority of money. Something in the club needs to change or we will find ourselves weaker every year.

exactly. how can u blame wenger for this?
 
One part of that letter which sticks out like a sore thumb is this paragraph here:



That is such a hypocritical statement, the letter was obviously meant to be made public otherwise it wouldn't have been leaked so easily, not to mention the timing of it, it's doing the exact thing which they are claiming they would never do. I don't know what Usmanov's angle is here but the only thing these public letters will encourage is fragmentation between the groups of supporters and possibly even have detrimental effects on the players. They have enough distractions without this idiot adding to them.

We've already spent over £20,000,000 in this transfer window, we clearly have money to spend and while we have tended to operate on a very stringent budget in regards to transfer fees, we are by no means a poor club, personally I think the way we do things is fine and I wouldn't want an owner who will just come in and ***** money left, right and centre. What happens if that owner were ever to leave? We'd be saddled with wages we can't afford to pay, we wouldn't be able to attract decent players either, we'd be in a dark place.

As it is at the moment a lot of the people we have brought in over the past few seasons have mentioned Wenger as one of the key reasons for signing, not everything is about money and I do believe the club has an ambition and a commitment to try and win trophies. We've fell short the past 5 or 6 years but during that time we've almost won the league and we reached a cup final, we have been competing for trophies so I don't really know what Usmanov and co are talking about.

The man has no class and no thought for the players or fans, it's not right to air your dirty laundry in public like this, players releasing statements is one thing, but you'd expect better from someone who apparently loves the club and apparently only wants the best. Does he think that writing such a damning letter and making it public is in the best interests of the club? The guy is a moron.

Same old song you and others are singing about billionaires taking over a club and running away. im yet to see teh chelsea owner bail out yet. everyone keeps saying same thing but no billionaire as bailed out on a club so you cant dance and sing about something that has never happened yet.

Arsenal need a billionaire to compete, simple as that. we will never ever compete with city and co with the way we run things. never will. expect anotehr 6+ years of winning **** all
 
If you want to support a sugar daddy bankrolled club then go and support City or Chelsea. I'd like to think Arsenal have a bit more class than that. :)

no thanks i aint a glory hunter :)

fact is we are in this position because of money and not to do with wenger.

Wenger has shown this season he is the 2nd best manager in the league easily. nearly as great as fergie.

Only fergie could sustain top 4 with this **** arsenal side. machini, redknap and dalglish could NEVER achieve a top 3 finish with THIS current arsenal side. never.
 
Your ever changing opinion on Wenger impresses me! I bet you've changed your opinion on him more today, than I've changed underwear all week! :D

Ironically, ever since i laid down the law and told u all earlier last season that if wenger dont make top 4 he should go and if he does make top 4 with such a **** squad then he deserves to stay. since then i have not once said he should be sacked
 
That article will embarass DM. no doubt DM has read it already and will not comment on it as he knows that article proves his opinions wrong

U all know i "use" to want wenger out but after last summer i realized This is not wengers fault.

You can put Morinho, Pep or even fergie and they will do no better maybe worse then wenger as all those managers would still be only buying average players.

Let me tell u who the real legend is. it aint RVP, fabregas or any of our world class players who have left us. its Wenger.

Wenger has shown redicolous amount of loyalty to arsenal. I mean name me a top class manager who would work with such a joke of a board?

Wenger has been mad e a scapegoat by the board yetw enger is stll with us? Wenegr has beens lated by fans including me at one point yet wenger is still with us?

dispite all teh flank he has got, wenger IS STILL with us. REFUSES to give up. that is a ****ing legend right there. not rvp, not thierry henry etc etc but Wenger.


He is teh true legend who never gsave up and backed out. he could have easily walked into the RM job, the french job and probably even the barca job yet he is our manager taking **** from people like DM and the board.

a true legend and if there was one man that comes lcose to being "bigger then the club" its wenger
 
Just for the record, firstly, I don't check pointless threads every day, secondly I don't read the daily mail, period, thirdly, you're still completely wrong.

I don't know another manager anywhere that would have handed Diaby a NEW 60k a week contract, when he's **** when he plays, and is also never able to play.

Its not wengers fault that some ****er broke his leg and struggling to recover from it. he DID look decent before that and you and i dont know how good he works in training


Look at Hargreaves for Utd, he barely plays and according to most fans he was great when he played, did they let sentiment get in the way of throwing money down the drain or did he leave when his contract ended?

THe article mentions Wenger sticking to his guns, etc, etc, except as always Wenger's philosophy in football today is COMPLETELY DIFFERENT to the one he used when Arsenal were winning things.

Wengers philisophy especially style of play is very similar to Barcelona/Spain. So it CAN work but we need better players to do so.

There was almost no "youth" in the squad when we last won the title, we had almost no trained at Arsenal players, we bought basically everyone, we had a higher wage bill than basically every team below us(except Utd on the years we won), he had no problem selling Overmars/Petit for a huge profit, even when they were fantastic for the club, and bringing in better players.

We bought mostly average unkown players and turned them into world class players. who was petit? fabregas? hleb? henry? rvp etc etc when they first joined us? Wenger transformered these players into world class players

He took risks, he in no way, at all at any stage focused on youth, his youth record of bringing long term Arsenal trainee's through is too this day god damned awful.

Look at Utd, with Welbeck playing, Scholes, Giggs still playing, Neville, Giggs, Cleverley, etc, etc.

Wenger makes a profit every year, because we have the second biggest stadium in the league, we got CL income FROM WHEN HE WAS SPENDING and playing very different football, we get huge tv money and we charge the highest ticket prices in the UK, if you can't be profitable when doing that you are failing.


Pretending Arsenal are "just" another team in the league and that third or 4th is brilliant is a joke, we spend 40mil more in wages than Spurs.



If there are 4 competitive teams spending 115mil + a season, being 4th is not terrible and certainly not brilliant.

Sorry but 3rd/4th IS BRILLIANT when you look at our team. Even you say our team is far worse then spurs and liverpool yet we finished above them and also gave those teams a MASSIVE headstart in the first half of last season trailing spurs what was it? 15 points? If you cant see what we have achieved with this **** squad then you are dillusional. You constant **** off walcott, santos etc etc yet they all helped us finish 3rd mate. that in itself is a great achievement especially by your standards you set for those players being poor.

So imagine if wenger diddnt buy "poor" players? we would win the title easily with a squad like spurs/liverpool yet reknapp/daglish messed up big time and wenger yet again shows he is a cut above the rest as a manager


Liverpool self distructed, so did Chelsea, Spurs with a competant manager would have also. Arsenal got two LESS points in the second half of the season than the first, yeah that awesome second half of the season that somehow made up for that awful start... is not remotely true. Spurs who were 13 points up on us at one stage, managed to throw away a massive number of points. They were on for basically a 20point lead if they maintained their form over Arsenal.

Doesnt matter if they self distructed or not. Not Wengers problem. Fact is we were the 3rd best team in england and **** players like walcott and song made that happen whether you like it or not. what does that show u abpout wenger? simple. he over achieves and punch above his weight. This side as no right to be 3rd best team lol

But as per usual, you're magically ignoring the point. You react to every other game, I've been saying for 7 years now that year on year our squad is getting worse, I've said we certainly risk dropping out of the top four, I never at any stage thought at the start of this season we would fight for relegation or come bottom half. I didn't over react like some people, its the TREND that Arsenal are getting worse every single year, that will eventually screw us completely.

Squad wise we get worse every year yet every year we finish top 4. Again what does that tell u about wenger's ability as a manager? it tells u that each year wenger is OVERACHIEVING

It's really this simple, if Wenger had ditched the rubbish every season instead of letting our top players walk out, mostly fed up of playing with the dross, we'd be in a PHENOMINALLY STRONG position now. Instead we're walking on the edge of a cliff Wenger is pushing us ever closer to falling over.

Letting our top players walk out? Fabregas coudl have walked out 3 years ago but wenger did not allow him too. RVP could still play his final contract. Wenger cant put a gun to there heads forcing them to stay. he does the best he can to convince them to stay. not much he can do mate

My mind hasn't changed, nothing Wenger has done has pushed Arsenal forward for years. As yet this years squad is worse than last years, and next years will likely be worse than this years.

We got RVP and Fabregas, Gallas, and some young keepers, we got these great players because at the time Arsenal were competitive.

We were top four this year because RVP who came to Arsenal because at the time Arsenal were a winning club, had a brilliant season. His replacement simply isn't anywhere near as good, how will that work out next season.

No, RVP came to us because we was the only club willing to buy him and his awful attitude at the time. We stuck by him, turned him into a world class player and always stood by him when he was injured and this is how he repays us by that disrespectful statement from him last week

This isn't THIS season being the season that broke the back, its the consequence of 7 years of decline.

When we do drop out of the top four, you'll react like it was a short term miraculous occurrence that was unforseeable and declare that Wenger had a bad season after a very good one the year before.

Sorry but a manager doing a good job wouldn't make his team worse EVERY single year for 7 years, its unthinkable.... while DOUBLING the wage bill.

Its not his fault the teams worse each year! blame the board. Blame them for not allowing wenger to spend 30m on players like Hazard and david silva. Yet 7 years on we still finish top 4 dispite our squad being a joke and u call that bad management?

So if thats bad management, what is redknapp and dalglish? lol. What other manager in the world could finish top 4 with THIS squad?


Denilson, Diaby, these guys should have left on free's 4 years ago, Walcott, lol, Santos, lol, our DM in Song who can't play DM and isn't great going forwards, Gervinho, Chamakh, Rosicky, etc, etc. We're talking about 10's and 10's of millions wasted on players that haven't provided anywhere near enough for the money they are on. Chelsea, City and to a degree Utd can all afford to keep **** players on the wage bill, Arsenal can't while hoping to win anything.

If you're happy with constant 4th's when we spend about the 4th highest wages and think that will continue when we can't sign top players any more, fine, good for you. I think Arsenal should be winning things, I can't see any reason why they shouldn't have for years. 3-4 players gone and 3-4 players in alongside the likes of Fabregas, RVP, Gallas, Clichy and we'd have been winning things over the last 7 years.

Wenger's steadfastly standing by players who simply haven't performed, while rewarding them every 2 years with new improved contracts is the difference between cups, the odd title, and being 4th out of 4 competitors.



replied in bold
 
Back
Top Bottom