Am I the only one who enjoyed mavity?

Soldato
Joined
25 Jun 2009
Posts
3,491
Location
Weston-super-Mare
I found it incredibly emotive...

The silence whilst debris sliced through space gave me goosebumps...

I genuinely felt stressed watching the main character jumping around knowing if she messed up its game over...

I dont watch many films, maybe that's why everyone I speak to thinks its a joke whilst I found it profound? (well, as much as a holywood film can be anyway)?
 
It was a lovely concept and the cinematography was excellent... however, it framed a pretty damn cheesy, predictable, oversensationalized piece-of-crap, run-of-the-mill plot, which is where it came crashing down to Earth... IMO, anyway.
 
I enjoyed it as well and I will echo raymonds comment.

I watched it on my projector, complete darkness and with surround sound:) very nice.
 
I enjoyed it as well and I will echo raymonds comment.

I watched it on my projector, complete darkness and with surround sound:) very nice.

mavity is as much an experience than it's storytelling. I believe this movie actually helps if you watch it in 3D even, it is a visual treat to watch it on as big a screen as possible, it does a good job of putting the viewer in the vacuum of space like no movie before it.
 
I liked it but only watched it on a little telly.

Would like to watch it again on a bigger screen with surround sound.
 
mavity is as much an experience than it's storytelling. I believe this movie actually helps if you watch it in 3D even, it is a visual treat to watch it on as big a screen as possible, it does a good job of putting the viewer in the vacuum of space like no movie before it.

I didn't even realise it was in 3d!! My projector supports 3d up to 150" and I have it setup at about 125".

May give this a rewatch in 3d at some point then
 
I expected to enjoy this movie more than I did. And to some extent that was actually true: I did enjoy it more than I did. But in other ways I felt it could have been so much more, and if it had been, I would have enjoyed it as much as I'd expected to.

The plot itself is very thin: we start with a disaster which segues into another disaster, which segues into another disaster... etc... until finally we run out of disasters and all of a sudden everything's OK. Which is a bit of a letdown to be honest.

Nevertheless this was an excellent science fiction film, with the most realistic depiction of mavity-free space in the history of cinema. The interior of the Soyuz capsule was painstakingly accurate, perfectly reproduced right down to the last switch and button.

But it's easy to get lost in the visuals and forget that they merely constitute a vehicle for the message.

mavity is replete with potent symbolism. I was impressed by its complex exploration of social identity, consciousness, environmental issues, economics, and human sexuality.

The last of these was the most obvious; phallic imagery everywhere, except in the scenes with George Clooney. That was a massive clue, and once I picked it up I could see exactly what the director was saying.

There are constant references to 2001: A Space Odyssey. This is more than just a homage; it's a complete remake of Kubrick's epic film. The mystical 'star birth' sequence is replicated with elegant sensitivity.

As the men die off one by one (*cough*misandry*cough*) Bullock's character questions herself constantly. She has no idea what she's doing there, any more than we do. Her monologue is halting and reluctant, as if she's reciting lines she has rehearsed beforehand.

Is she really a mother? Does she know what being a mother is? She seems to believe she has a daughter, yet we never see the daughter. What does the daughter represent? The obvious answer is 'lesbianism' (remember, all the men are dead! big hint!) but perhaps that's too obvious? As in real life, the tension of this existential dilemma is never quite resolved.

Many critics have identified mavity as unashamedly heterophobic, and I can't deny that. As a heterosexual man I did find it very challenging. Yet I still felt it spoke to me as a filmgoer, but more importantly as a human person. It was an enriching experience.

8.5/10.

:)
 
I expected to enjoy this movie more than I did. And to some extent that was actually true: I did enjoy it more than I did. But in other ways I felt it could have been so much more, and if it had been, I would have enjoyed it as much as I'd expected to.

Donald Rumsfeld in disguise?

Interesting review. I didn't spot any of the phallic symbolism. Maybe I'm just dumb.

I really enjoyed the experience on the big screen, it was spectacular in 3D.
 
It's a one watch film for me. It was entertaining enough but I probably wouldn't watch it again anytime soon.
 
I think it's the best cinema experience I'ved had (5/5) and a good film (4/5).

I liked almost everything and visually it was stunning but I thought the obviousness of the symbolism was just too much to the point where I almost found it insulting to my intelligence. It sort of felt like there was a big neon arrow pointing going "oooooo symbolism check this out see what we did here aren't we clever!". You have to have the perception of a fish not to draw themes about being born or re-birth... Especially with the long hanging shot of the female lead in the fetal possition and the lead looking like an umbilical cord - which actually caused me to scoff in the cinema. A more subtle approach would have been way more effective. Just how dumb do they think the audience is!!!

That aside, the opening spinning sequence was absolutely nerve shredding and I thought it was amazing how they were able to make you care for the characters almost instantly. Simple effective storytelling.
 
I think it's the best cinema experience I'ved had (5/5) and a good film (4/5).

I liked almost everything and visually it was stunning but I thought the obviousness of the symbolism was just too much to the point where I almost found it insulting to my intelligence. It sort of felt like there was a big neon arrow pointing going "oooooo symbolism check this out see what we did here aren't we clever!". You have to have the perception of a fish not to draw themes about being born or re-birth... Especially with the long hanging shot of the female lead in the fetal possition and the lead looking like an umbilical cord - which actually caused me to scoff in the cinema. A more subtle approach would have been way more effective. Just how dumb do they think the audience is!!!

That aside, the opening spinning sequence was absolutely nerve shredding and I thought it was amazing how they were able to make you care for the characters almost instantly. Simple effective storytelling.

^^ This. Absolutely this.
 
As a spectacle it was fine, the acting was fine.

But I find it impossible to *really* enjoy a film if the plot is utterly implausible. It's supposed to be set in the real world, so it doesn't get away with comic book physics and that kind of thing. But everything that happened after the main incident just gets more and more ridiculous.
 
I watched it in 3D on my nVidia Glasses and enjoyed it especially the external shots. I'm definitely more in to the techy aspects rather than the story. I've watched it since I sold the 3D monitor and still enjoyed it almost as much.
 
As a spectacle it was fine, the acting was fine.

But I find it impossible to *really* enjoy a film if the plot is utterly implausible. It's supposed to be set in the real world, so it doesn't get away with comic book physics and that kind of thing. But everything that happened after the main incident just gets more and more ridiculous.

Pretty much sums up my thoughts too.
 
Back
Top Bottom