Change wifi card for an £8 usb wireless adapter, frees that slot up then.
That's a good option worth considering, I'll have a look for a decent dongle that can run 802.11n 300Mb/s on Linux cheers.
Change wifi card for an £8 usb wireless adapter, frees that slot up then.
Indigo340;26871497 So my question is this; Is it worth going down the FM2 route in order to get the best from SATA3 with an SSD (and accept the performance hit of the 760K) or stick with the AM3+ and maybe go for the FX4300 or FX6300 and put up with a 6GB/s SSD running at half it's potential speed ? Suggestions/links most welcome :)[/QUOTE said:I had an Fx6300 paired with a Gigabyte 78LMT-USB3,which is one of the very few mATX boards in the am3+ range.It does however only have Sata2 rather than sata3.I used an SSD on it(Samsung 840 pro) and obviously due to only having sata2 instead of sata3 i didnt get the full maximization of the Drives speed.It was still lightning fast tho.Im now running the same drive on a mobo with Sata3,and honestly i cannot tell the difference.It is obviously faster,but in noway does it feel faster than before.The main benefit of SSD's is the fast seek times and read/writes,for these it doesnt matter its still so fast you cant percieve the difference.
The motherboard itself is extremely cheap,aswell as being reliable and having heatsinked VRM's which would aid you greatly should you chose to overclock a CPU with it at a later date
Personally i would reccomend a cheap Intel mAtx mobo paired with the Pentium anniversary addition for you.
But as you have said your not really into gaming and wont be doing any rendering ect,and you would rather stick with AMD an fx6300 should be more than adequate for your needs,you would be able to get that CPU and the motherboard i mentioned above together for £100(or maybe a little less)
Its in its own right a nice CPU(pity about the IPC tho)