Amanda Knoxx retrial

Personally, I've always thought she's a bit of a physcopath. It's just the expression she gives off. Like it's all a game. I could be wrong, but my view is still valid.

I don't care what anyone says, she at least know something. I'm going at a step further to say she is the murderer. At no point during the trial did she protest her innocence. And everytime I saw her she look cold and detached.

Answer me this, why would an innocent person change their stories several times, and then try and pin the blame on a completely innocent person? Seems way too fishy to me.
 
And for all those saying there's no DNA, I'm pretty sure there was. Here are some points I pinched from another site:

  • Knox’s DNA was found on the handle (Kercher’s DNA on the blade) of the knife used to slit Meredith’s throat.
  • An abundant amount of Sollecito’s DNA was found on the clasp of Kercher’s bra, which had been forcibly removed (the bra was severed with a knife). Knox’s DNA was also found on Meredith’s bra.
  • Luminol, a chemical agent used by forensic investigators to detect blood at crime scenes, revealed bloody footprints all over the house. The footprints were compatible with those of Knox and Sollecito. An additional footprint, believed to be Knox's, was found underneath Kercher’s body.
  • There were no less than five separate instances of Knox’s DNA being mixed with Kercher’s blood in three different locations in the house they shared.
  • The morning after the murder, Knox showered in a bathroom with Kercher’s blood still smeared across the sink and floor.
  • A shopkeeper testified to seeing Knox come into the store to buy cleaning supplies, most notably the bleach that was used (unsuccessfully) to clean the murder weapon, at 7:45 on the morning after the murder. Knox claimed not to have gone to the store.
  • A staged break-in designed to throw off the investigation was quickly dismissed by police because the window had been broken AFTER the room had been ransacked. Nothing had been taken in the “burglary” btw.
  • Knox and Sollecito gave multiple and conflicting accounts of their whereabouts on the night of the murder. None of their alibis was credible.
  • On the day after the murder, Knox phoned Kercher’s two cell phones, to help establish her false alibi that she was at Sollecito’s apartment. She was then seen throwing the cell phones into a neighbor’s backyard, presumably to aid the burglary story.
  • Knox was photographed kissing and cooing with Sollecito as the forensics team was removing her roommate's blood-soaked body from the house.
  • Knox was seen turning cartwheels and doing handstands after being interrogated at the police station. She evidently thought she’d (literally) gotten away with murder.
  • Knox falsely accused Patrick Lumumba, a former employer, of murdering Kercher. She admitted she knew he was innocent in a conversation with her mother which was intercepted by police. She later changed her story to implicate Guede as the murderer.
  • Knox voluntarily admitted that she was involved in Kercher’s murder in a handwritten note she gave the police, one week after the crime.
  • Knox was constantly laughing, smiling and “voguing” for court cameras during the murder trial.
  • Knox was known to be promiscuous, very kinky in her sexual appetites and heavily involved in drug use (mostly methamphetamine and hashish). Evidence suggests Knox disliked Kercher intensely and was jealous of her good looks in particular. They’d only occupied the house together for a week and were not friends.
 
If it's not Amanda Knoxx, that means some random person went into Meredith Kercher's apartment, raped her, then killed her. What are the odds of that happening? Nearly all murders are done by someone who knows the person.

And again, I ask, why would a completely innocent person change their story, not once, but several times? And why also would they try to shift the blame onto a completely innocent person? Why also would they make a written confession a week later? I don't care what anyone says. No innocent person admits to something which they haven't done.
 
Why would Knoxx's DNA be found on Kercher's bra? 3 people were involved in this murder. Two are currently walking among us has free as you and I. That should worry you.

Knox said she spent the night of the murder at Sollecito's house. She maintained they smoked a joint, watched the French film "Amelie" and made love. Knox at one point told investigators she was home the night of the murder and had to cover her ears against Kercher's screams while she was attacked by a Congolese man who owned a bar where Knox worked. That accusation formed the basis of the slander verdict against Knox, which was upheld Tuesday. Knox said she was manipulated into the statement during a lengthy police interrogation and later said she hadn't been back in her apartment that night.

This is one gets me. I can understand someone signing something whilst under duress, but why would an innocent person complete a statement the next day, and a written confession a week later?

Guede side of the story is that he heard Kercher and Knox argue over money minutes before the Briton was slain. Guede claimed he had fallen ill and had gone into the bathroom with his iPod when he heard "a very loud scream" coming from Kercher's bedroom. He rushed to the bedroom, he said, where he saw an unidentified man who tried to attack him. Backing into the hall, Guede said he heard the man say, "Let's go. There's a black man in the house."

I know I'm right when I say knoxx is a murderer. I can only hope justice is served, somehow I don't see that happening now.
 
Whatever. I just feel sorry for Meredith and her family.

Lets not forget, knox's parents have spent around 1 million dollars defending her. Do you believe those lawyers care about justice? More like there fat pay cheques.

Here's some information: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=48RNhSnwHJc

I guess we'll never know now. What massive **** up from start to finish. The media should be banned whilst a trial is going on. I should also say, why is the justice system we have stacked in favour of the defendant? They get numerous appeals. That doesn't sit right with me.

PS: The video mentions her doing cartwheels as I previously posted. That doesn't strike me as someone who is devastated that their 'friend' has been murdered. I understand people can react to tragedy in different ways, but doing cartwheels is just weird.

EDIT: Here's the cleaning supplies bit I was talking about: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/wor...A-new-hole-appears-in-Amanda-Knoxs-alibi.html
 
Last edited:
[FnG]magnolia;24020141 said:
There's something strangely attractive about the black and white world in which our beloved OP lives in. He knows that knoxx (sic) is a murderer. He knows this. He is capable of copying and pasting comments from those far brighter than he himself and then endorsing them.

Because he knows.
Click to expand...

Copying and pasting what? Facts? What am I supposed to do - make up facts that didn't happen? Idiot. Live your life as an apologetic. Your kind never show themselves in the public light because you know the public would be gunning for ya.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom