• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

AMD better value on a Budget?

Associate
Joined
13 Feb 2012
Posts
543
So now I'm build a media centre for my dad (some of you may have seen the other thread about the one I was Given)

I'm going to go M-ATX motherboard as I think a ITX board and case is to small and my dads not too bothered about the size of it within reason.

I've always used Intel, but looking at it AMD offer better value when on a budget. so for £90 Max I need a motherboard and CPU - Can anyone suggest one please?

I realise I could get a cheapo mobo and pop an Intel G530 in there, but from what I see its not too far off the budget to go quad core with an AMD:confused:
 
Just rebuilt my dads PC with a G530 and the cheapest 1155 mobo ocuk had at the time and its great. Come in at under £75 for mobo and CPU.

If i had of been building it for a media centre id have added in something like a 5450 or Geforce 210, or spent a bit more on the mobo to get HDMI.
 
So now I'm build a media centre for my dad (some of you may have seen the other thread about the one I was Given)

I'm going to go M-ATX motherboard as I think a ITX board and case is to small and my dads not too bothered about the size of it within reason.

I've always used Intel, but looking at it AMD offer better value when on a budget. so for £90 Max I need a motherboard and CPU - Can anyone suggest one please?

I realise I could get a cheapo mobo and pop an Intel G530 in there, but from what I see its not too far off the budget to go quad core with an AMD:confused:

But the FX4 is 90 quid.
Wut.

Cheapest board and FX4 is ; http://www.overclockers.co.uk/showproduct.php?prodid=CP-314-AM & http://www.overclockers.co.uk/showproduct.php?prodid=MB-331-GI That has some future proofing CPU wise.

Cheapest 1155 is ; http://www.overclockers.co.uk/showproduct.php?prodid=MB-079-AK & http://www.overclockers.co.uk/showproduct.php?prodid=CP-401-IN&groupid=701&catid=6&subcat=2037


About a 50-60 quid difference in price there.
 
Last edited:
He probably meant Llano. But even then the cheapest quad core variant is ~£85 on OcUK.

OP, for a media PC, both Intel and AMD are perfectly fine for 1080p media. Probably might edge to Llano for the odd light gaming, but it's up to you.
 
He probably meant Llano. But even then the cheapest quad core variant is ~£85 on OcUK.

OP, for a media PC, both Intel and AMD are perfectly fine for 1080p media. Probably might edge to Llano for the odd light gaming, but it's up to you.

But the Intel set up is cheaper than the AMD CPU alone.
Along with its upgrade path of Ivy.
 
Cheapest Intel:


Cheapest AMD:


Pretty close between the two to be honest.
 
The 1155 kills the Llano in CPU performance, for media both will be fine.
FM1 hasn't got an upgrade path past the quad core llano's, socket 1155 has upto an i7 3770.

You'd be foolish to get the Llano, also that isn't the cheapest Intel, the cheapest Intel is sub 75 quid, you messed up on the board ; http://www.overclockers.co.uk/showproduct.php?prodid=MB-079-AK

True, but I wasn't sure if the lower Intel was fine enough. But yes, the Intel will be more future proof.

That board doesn't have HDMI, unless it comes with a DVI to HDMI adapter.
 
Intel has the 24fps bug though, which might be an issue for a media centre. Plus you don't need anything more than the Llano CPU wise for a media centre so upgrade path isn't really an issue.
 
DVI to HDMI adaptors can be had for pennies.

Intel has the 24fps bug though, which might be an issue for a media centre. Plus you don't need anything more than the Llano CPU wise for a media centre so upgrade path isn't really an issue.

Thought it was 23.X or something?
If that bug wasn't an issue in the OP's usage, I honestly don't see why people would pay more for the Llano to end up with much worse CPU performance, seems illogical at best.
 
Thought it was 23.X or something?
If that bug wasn't an issue in the OP's usage, I honestly don't see why people would pay more for the Llano to end up with much worse CPU performance, seems illogical at best.
Yeah, it should be 23.976, Intel can only do 24. It may or may not be an issue, depending on the OP's dad. But for a media centre it seems daft to go Intel for a faster CPU, when he won't make use of it and it may actually irrate him when watching films on it.
 
But it's the cheaper set up too, why get the lower performance at a higher price point?
If there's no problem with the playback of course.
Obviously, if the playback is an issue, you're best off on the Llano, but if there isn't? The Intel is cheaper.
 
But it's the cheaper set up too, why get the lower performance at a higher price point?
If there's no problem with the playback of course.

If Intel has the 24fps bug, then it's probably better to go with Llano. Even though it has less CPU performance, it will give the better media playback, which is what OP wants.
 
No it's not, the board in Vaders is 10 quid more expensive than the cheapest Intel board.
Yeah, and the AMD CPU is £9 cheaper than the Intel one. If his dad is genuinely going to need the additional CPU performance and can live with the 24fps bug, sure get the Intel, but in this case for a bog standard media box there's no real reason for it.
 
Yeah, and the AMD CPU is £9 cheaper than the Intel one. If his dad is genuinely going to need the additional CPU performance and can live with the 24fps bug, sure get the Intel, but in this case for a bog standard media box there's no real reason for it.

:confused:

The G530 with applicable board is 10 quid cheaper than the A4 and board, vader has a 48 pound Intel board in his link, there's a 38 quid one.
The Intel CPU is cheaper than the A4.

The AMD set up is 10 quid more expensive.
 
:confused:

The G530 with applicable board is 10 quid cheaper than the A4 and board, vader has a 48 pound Intel board in his link, there's a 38 quid one.
The Intel CPU is cheaper than the A4.
Ah right, there's also a cheaper FM1 board as well, vader's not made a very good job has he :o
 
Ah right, there's also a cheaper FM1 board as well, vader's not made a very good job has he :o

Cheapest AMD board comes with Nexuiz :p
Price difference is 8 quid between the two, in favour to the Intel set up, along with about 35% better CPU performance (Difference in IPC, Llano is about Athlon II)
Wish Intel would release Ivy pentiums/celerons already.
 
Back
Top Bottom