AMD build vs INTEL/NVidia

Associate
Joined
30 Oct 2014
Posts
2,081
Location
Norfolk
The Intel build is nice, but the AMD build is a better GFX card and you could even get the PCS+ R9 290 at £199 and match the price of the Intel.

YOUR BASKET
1 x Powercolor Radeon R9 290 PCS+ OC 4096MB GDDR5 PCI-Express Graphics Card £199.99
1 x AMD Piledriver FX-8 Eight Core 8320E Black Edition 3.20GHz (Socket AM3+) Processor - Retail £109.99
1 x Gigabyte 970A-DS3P AMD 970A (Socket AM3+) DDR3 Motherboard £52.99
1 x Avexir Core Red Series 8GB (2x4GB) DDR3 PC3-12800C11 1600MHz Dual Channel Memory Kit (AVD3U16001104G-2CIR) - Red Light £49.99
1 x Toshiba (7K1000.D) 1TB SATA 6GB/s 32MB Cache - OEM (DT01ACA100) HDD £39.95
Total : £462.52 (includes shipping : £8.00).



What case+PSU do you have?

Antec high current gamer 510w and Fractal R5. So if I would go ahead with that AMD build, is it equally equivalent performance or is there a better outcome?
 
The intel build is defiantly the far better option of the two above.

Dont underestimate how important a powerful CPU is for gaming.The I5 is significantly better than the FX core CPU's when it comes to gaming.Need to clock FX cpu's to 4.3-4.5ghz to match them for gaming most of the time.

It would be worth it even the slightly weaker GPU as your rig would have far better longevity imo

Edit:I had an Fx CPU and moved to intel,i did like my fx6300 tho,awesome little cpus for the cost.But for smooth gaming I5 is a lot better

Yeah ill be sticking to intel, amd doesnt really appeal to me, rather be assured performance for the extra cash upon, I guess AMD would only be suited to build a system that isnt for gaming
 
Back
Top Bottom