• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

AMD Mantle finally on BF4

Status
Not open for further replies.
Associate
Joined
25 Apr 2009
Posts
168
Post your experience here, what % has your game improved?

Test case 1: Low-end single-player
CPU/GPU: AMD A10-7850K (‘Kaveri’ APU), 4 cores @ 3.7 GHz
Settings: 720p MEDIUM settings.
OS: Windows 7 64-bit
Level: Singapore “Beach”
This area is heavy on the CPU as it is quite a lot of action going on, but the game is primarily GPU-bound both on DX and with Mantle but thanks to GPU optimizations with Mantle we get a good performance improvement.
Result: 26.6 ms/f -> 23.3 ms/f = 14% faster

Test case 2: Standard 64-player multiplayer
CPU: AMD FX-8350, 8 cores @ 4 GHz
GPU: AMD Radeon 7970 3 GB
Settings: 1080p ULTRA 1x MSAA
OS: Windows 8 64-bit
Level: Siege of Shanghai
Level was tested with 64 “pseudo players” that we have for our own internal testing that simulates heavy game workload that we have in multiplayer in order to get more deterministic results compared to full real multiplayer. 64 players on the large Battlefield levels is really demanding of the CPU so this test case is primarily CPU-bound.
Result: 18.87 ms/f -> 15.08 ms/f = 25.1% faster

Test case 3: High-end single-player with multiple GPUs
CPU: Intel Core i7-3970x Extreme, 12 logical cores @ 3.5 GHz
GPU: 2x AMD Radeon R9 290x 4 GB
Settings: 1080p ULTRA 4x MSAA
OS: Windows 8 64-bit
Level: South China Sea “Broken Flight Deck”
This single-player scene is heavy on both the CPU and GPU with lots of action going on. Test was done on the highest end Intel CPU on Windows 8, which is the fastest option before Mantle thanks to DirectX 11.1. Still this CPU is not fast enough to keep the 2 290x GPUs fed at 1080p on Ultra settings so we get a significant CPU performance bottleneck which results in major performance improvement when enabling Mantle.
Result: 13.24 ms/f -> = 8.38 ms/f = 58% faster
 
You not already see the massive Mantle thread?

Why do you keep getting funny with people when someone posts a different Mantle thread to your own?

That thread is just too big now - I personally think it's better served now letting that thread go and having actual tangible performance discussed in a separate thread.
 
Why do you keep getting funny with people when someone posts a different Mantle thread to your own?

That thread is just too big now - I personally think it's better served now letting that thread go and having actual tangible performance discussed in a separate thread.

Because it's Mantle and Mantle discussion and easy to keep reading along. We dont need more.

It make it easy to keep reading when I out in work.

:p
 
Why do you keep getting funny with people when someone posts a different Mantle thread to your own?

That thread is just too big now - I personally think it's better served now letting that thread go and having actual tangible performance discussed in a separate thread.

Someone's jellllllllllllllllllllllly :p
 
You not already see the massive Mantle thread?

Do you mean the "AMD unveils revolutionary 'Mantle'" thread?

This is a compare BF4 fps now that it's actually been released to the public thread. Or a lets all spam the compare BF4 fps now that it's actually been released to the public thread with lols and comments about how there is already a mantle thread.:D
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom