• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

AMD or NVIDIA

Well I dont know I just meant that the official releases are less likely to have bugs no? I just said WHQL but I mean surely the official releases are less likely to have bugs than the betas? It even has a disclaimer on the website saying that?

That's what I've been responding about, realistically they aren't actually less likely, because the certification process that they use to deem releases as official don't look in to aren't related to how the cards themselves run.

One way to look at it is that official releases with WHQL is more of a formality.

Have a look here; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WHQL_Testing

Beta or "official" isn't more or less likely to have bugs based on being official or certified.
 
But maybe the official drivers have additional testing as well as WHQL certification... I don't know, maybe they are just the betas with WHQL certification.

I wonder why they even bother having beta and official releases...

Why don't they just have for example....

13.1 official
13.2 official
13.3 official
13.4 WHQL
etc.

Maybe they just like the word beta.
 
Last edited:
Our latest, greatest slate of optimizations and fixes are always in the betas. The same is true of Google Chrome, Steam and many other programs we know and love. We iterate these beta drivers until we're happy with the codebase, then the final beta in that chain receives some last-minute polish and gets submitted to WLK testing for WHQL.

That last-minute polish carries forward into a new set of betas, along with all-new optimizations merged into the codebase from our developers for evaluation in and telemetry data from the field.

Beta drivers are always newer than WHQL, and the code is often quite a lot more mature than the "beta" tag suggests. I always, always, always run beta.

WHQL drivers are very important for OEMs, system integrators, your "average" user, Microsoft and other organizations that depend on a secure/WHQL/tested environment. They cannot afford the occasional hiccup of a beta, which is why we will continue to publish them when a current set of betas reaches a point where they're ready for release as WHQL.

//EDIT: Many corporations, for example, can only run WHQL drivers because their IT environments required Microsoft-signed drivers.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom