• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

AMD - PCI-E Lanes going forward

Soldato
Joined
9 Dec 2006
Posts
9,289
Location
@ManCave
Hi all,

I currently have a 2950X (£800) after getting this i went all in on NVME storage & now have 6 NVME drives & looking to get more.
Which is great for performance of my workflow

However looking at future AMD products it seems Threadripper is pretty much DEAD in terms of
High End PC enthusiasts & much more a "firePro" product & now aimed at true professionals. (£1700 for my direct upgrade)

Looking at the 5900s Series - they lack the PCI-Lanes to really support Fast Direct Storage
It "apparently have 40 lanes"

20 appears to be used for the chipset (USB,ethernet etc)
20 for users GPU - 1 NVME drive

so it appears Fast Storage support is not going to be with us for a long time?
Have i missed anything?
I cannot upgrade my CPU unless i either ditch NVME or Go Threadripper just for PCI-E
 
Some workflow isn't about just more cores, but faster cores. This is why very fast 16 core EPYC parts exist with massive RAM and I/O capabilities.
indeed,

your first post kind of works, but chipset will be slower. really need a mainstream to have more lanes or a board to drop SATA entirely i don't use sata at all

waiting on my GPu (3090) :)
 
You don't currently have PCI-E 4.0, so not sure how it will be slower? The chipset lanes support 4x 4.0 lanes which is 8x 3.0 of bandwidth so you can make full use of those at the same time, the single 4.0 M.2 connect to the CPU can be run at full speed, as can the two drives (up to 4.0 speed) in the secondary 16x PCI-E slot.

Are you saying you want to go will all new drives at 4.0 speeds? What drives are your running at the moment, and capacities etc?

chip-set is generally slower even if the bandwidth is their, latency drops.
Currently using
5x Samsung Pro 970's (2TB)
1x Samsung Evo 970 250GB (OS)

although i won't instantly upgrade to 4.0 speeds, will be nice to have support in the future.
this thread was more for general discussion that getting fast storage on a decent platform is not really progressing unless you spend a lot of money just for pci-e lanes

Threadripper 2000s & 1000s was wewll priced 3000/ possibly 5000s are going the way of Xeon.
 
very true good breakdown.
my case is very double sided, i am a professional, I don't necessary use this Workstation as my Main Work computer for profit, But i do like to work from Home too & learn on my own time.
So whilst its not directly link to the "PC Earns me Money So its worth it" its closely linked as learning would be lot slower.
Also game too :P

cheers for the convo.
 
Back
Top Bottom