• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

AMD Phenom II In-Depth Performance Scaling Analysis

Soldato
Joined
7 May 2006
Posts
12,183
Location
London, Ealing
Introduction:

Madshrimps (c)


As you probably already have noticed, Madshrimps did not publish an article regarding the Phenom II's performance in comparison to competitive products. There are two main reasons: on one hand, we only received our Phenom II sample a few days after the product launch, which means that most hardware reviewing websites already had an article regarding the Phenom II. Ours would just have been 'yet another' comparison and would only serve to confirm everything we already know. On the other hand, we had the possibility to test the widely hyped overclockability of the processor and check if the rumors about 6GHz were indeed true.

We were actually surprised by the excellent overclocking scaling of the Phenom II X4 940 on LN2! As you may or may not know, our retail (but sent by AMD) sample went beyond 6GHz quite easily and there was absolutely no sign of any coldbug. Unlike its predecessor, the Phenom II (also referred to as Ph-II) is indeed meant for overclocking ... well, extreme overclocking. In 24/7 configurations, it's still very difficult to reach 4GHz stable on normal air cooling, which doesn't match the current C2D overclocking capabilities.

These were our findings of our performance scaling article on AMD’s Phenom I:

"If you're planning to spend a couple of minutes on overclocking, you should go for the raw cpu megahertz overclocking ... which is fairly obvious. Everything else gives a nice boost, but that's it; no real extreme increases in performance. Note that it's important how you interpret the graphs: this is a performance scaling investigation, not an overclocking scaling investigation. Please understand that the given increases are expressed in comparison to a very low base frequency, not at stock speeds. For instance, the performance scaling of the HT Link frequency may seem very impressive in the 3D benchmark, but if you look more closely, you'll notice that 1GHz is almost enough to maximize performance."
(~ AMD Phenom In-Depth Performance Scaling Analysis)


We already had a peek at the overclocking performance scaling of the Phenom I. In the article, you were able to find out that the processor frequency had the biggest effect in performance, which is pretty obvious, and that overclocking the IMC frequency is actually quite interesting to get the absolute most out of your machine. Since we got a lot of positive feedback about the first article, we did the exact same for the Phenom II. In this write-up, you will find out what's the impact of each overclocking variable performance-wise.
Madshrimps
 
I was playing with the BIOS this morning and noticed that, even if you change the HT/NB frequency, when you open CPU-Z, it says the link is still running at the default of 1600MT. I found out though that if you change the NB frequency and open Everest, under the Overclock tab, it displays the NB running at the frequency I'd set in the BIOS (2000), but the HT speed still running at the default value.

So the NB frequency can be changed, but I haven't figured out how to change the HT speed to the corresponding value.

That can be down to the motherboard & BIOS error not allowing it.
 
Back
Top Bottom