Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
sup3rc0w said:Gogo copy and paste boy.
Seriously dude, do you have a few screws loose or something. Always with the most random posts/threads.
Watch out, germans taking over the world!!
AcidHell2 said:Not sure if it's the same now, probably is.
But back in the athalon days. AMD used increased instruction sets, basicly meaning the cpu could do more complicated calculations in a single clock cycle. where Intel use a simpler instruction set and thus solves complicated calculation with more cpu cycles.
hence intel need a higher Ghz processor to do the same calculation, so amd did the performance rating so when it says 6000+ it's meant to mean its the same as a 6GHz Intel. Although in reality it's not true any more.
AcidHell2 said:For future cpu/gpu chips. combining the two to make an ultra mobile chip that's uses drastically less energy as both chips will be combined into 1 core.
AcidHell2 said:I should say 1 chip, rather than same core, as far as I read the idea is to have a set up like a dual core, but one cpu and 1 gpu. The benefits is you miss out *** entire motherboard. For communication between the two.