• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

AMD Quietly Lists 31 New CPU Vulnerabilities, Issues Patch Guidance

odd how when intel have cpu security issues the whole internet lights up like a christmas tree but when amd screw up its all kept under the rug lol.
there will always be some flaw getting found out but lets hope as you say it doesnt impact performance. amd just back tracked an update due to it disabling cores so that was a major performance hit.
 
odd how when intel have cpu security issues the whole internet lights up like a christmas tree but when amd screw up its all kept under the rug lol.
there will always be some flaw getting found out but lets hope as you say it doesnt impact performance. amd just back tracked an update due to it disabling cores so that was a major performance hit.

So true! :D We would have been on page 50 by now had this been intel :p

Don't forget though, amd are a charity and the white knight for pc gamers :cry:
 
  • Haha
Reactions: TNA
odd how when intel have cpu security issues the whole internet lights up like a christmas tree but when amd screw up its all kept under the rug lol.
"Kept under the rug"... by being reported on one of the largest hardware news sites on the internet? Both AMD and Intel (and just about every other major hardware and software vendor) "quietly" lists CVEs the same way on a regular basis. "Quietly" in this context being "publically published for anyone to view" of course, but let's not let facts get in the way of clickbait headlines implying underhandedness. There's also the fact that there's just not much in these disclosures for the average desktop user to care about. The only desktop Ryzen chips affected are Zen+ CPUs and 5000-series APUs (and the latter only by a single CVE). There's also zero indication at this point that any mitigations will have an impact on performance.

Weird thread really, with a bunch of people trying to show how fair and balanced they are by signal boosting a story that they didn't read past the headline.
 
Last edited:
The issue isn't the vulnerabilities it's if the manufacturers release an update bios to counter said vulnerabilities.... with AMD being more popular these days, more people will be testing AMD chips for issues.

MSI currently have the same 'beta' bios out since 6+ months ago (around the ftpm stutter bios fix) for my motherboard.... I won't hold my breath on an update for my b550 board...

Having said that... most of those vulnerabilities look like the user needs direct access to the pc so...
 
Last edited:
"Kept under the rug"... by being reported on one of the largest hardware news sites on the internet? Both AMD and Intel (and just about every other major hardware and software vendor) "quietly" lists CVEs the same way on a regular basis. "Quietly" in this context being "publically published for anyone to view" of course, but let's not let facts get in the way of clickbait headlines implying underhandedness. There's also the fact that there's just not much in these disclosures for the average desktop user to care about. The only desktop Ryzen chips affected are Zen+ CPUs and 5000-series APUs (and the latter only by a single CVE). There's also zero indication at this point that any mitigations will have an impact on performance.

Weird thread really, with a bunch of people trying to show how fair and balanced they are by signal boosting a story that they didn't read past the headline.

Can you stop ruining the weird circle jerk please.
 
Last edited:
Weird really sums up some of these subsections over the last 20+ years, people with raging boners for tech companies that want their cash has always bemused me.

Agree, I find it just as equally hilarious how amd can do no wrong and if something isn't quite as good or they do mess up, they're given a pass because people have this weird fixation that they are the "white knights for customers", I mean just look at this thread, hardly any posts, meanwhile when intel was having cpu security issues brought up, was a new thread created all the time which would explode:

 
Back
Top Bottom