just shows how childish people are over something that makes 0 difference, or how gullible they are to marketingBut it's fun though it gets the Nvidia fanatics worked up
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
just shows how childish people are over something that makes 0 difference, or how gullible they are to marketingBut it's fun though it gets the Nvidia fanatics worked up
You mean like Ray Tracing?just shows how childish people are over something that makes 0 difference, or how gullible they are to marketing
DP 1.4 caps out at 120Hz at 4kpeople are making a huge deal out of it but neither card is powerful enough to take advantage of a dp2.1 port anyway and I'm guessing 99% of users won't have a monitor that does uber high refresh either.
Does make you wonder if panels have been held back a little by the connection technology rather than vice-versa. Guess we're gonna find out soon enough!which is why they claim the 7900XTX supports 900hz refresh rates
do we know how the 7900 XTX stacks up with blender and other productivity yet!?
2 x 8pin connectors, clearly as much performance as possible, but limited by the available power. Even the cooler looks reasonable.Looks like the uarch has been designed to hit 3GHZ:
AMD Radeon RX 7000 Event: Live Interviews & Analysis
Join Gordon and guests as they provide analysis of AMD's "together we advance_gaming” livestream revealing details around Radeon RX 7000 "RDNA 3" GPUs and mo...www.youtube.com
The guys from PCWorld,Tom's Hardware and Level1Techs think AMD has clocked the reference cards for optimal performance/watt but the AIB cards might see much higher clockspeeds,but the power limits will be much higher.
2 x 8pin connectors, clearly as much performance as possible, but limited by the available power. Even the cooler looks reasonable.
But as soon some AIB uses a 3 x 8pin, some bigger cooler, I would expect the performance gap to be noticeably bigger than we normally see from reference to mid/high AIB. Performance won't increase proportionally to power used, as never does, but I don't expect to see some wimpy 2 to 5%. If that happens, will be very disappointing.
Does make you wonder if panels have been held back a little by the connection technology rather than vice-versa. Guess we're gonna find out soon enough!
Isn't it obvious when Nvidia tried to price the RTX4060 12GB as a £900 RTX4080 12GB and the RTX4070 16GB as the nearly £1300 RTX4080 16GB??So with AMD saying that the 7900XTX is a 4080 competitor, does that therefore mean the lower stack isn't going to be as cheap as people hoped it would be? Ironically, the RDNA3 rumours thread has become overrun with nVidia fans arguing with themselves
That comment about being a 4080 competitor is interesting, if we are talking about a price competitor it is cheaper than theSo with AMD saying that the 7900XTX is a 4080 competitor, does that therefore mean the lower stack isn't going to be as cheap as people hoped it would be? Ironically, the RDNA3 rumours thread has become overrun with nVidia fans arguing with themselves
I wouldn't even be tempted if the AIB OC only gave that boost, at that point the premium price they charge probably wouldn't be worth it. A stock reference design would likely be better.2 x 8pin connectors, clearly as much performance as possible, but limited by the available power. Even the cooler looks reasonable.
But as soon some AIB uses a 3 x 8pin, some bigger cooler, I would expect the performance gap to be noticeably bigger than we normally see from reference to mid/high AIB. Performance won't increase proportionally to power used, as never does, but I don't expect to see some wimpy 2 to 5%. If that happens, will be very disappointing.