Yes, it's nowhere near what they claimed and no idea what is going on when frame-limited to 144Hz, but the relevant chart was the one before, so unsure why the twitter used that one:
so +17% to +18% but -4%.
Still, chiplet was always going to be negative for perf/watt.
If AMD had passed the cost savings from going chiplet onto us consumers that would probably have acceptable to most (but that doesn't let AMD PR off the hook), but instead AMD went up in price and kept the increased* margins from going chiplet to themselves.
Except, with the way they have over-priced Navi31 (not just absolutely, but it has actually done the impossible: made 4080 like less of a rip-off) it will only be higher
margins not overall profit as they seem to be aiming for a 5% marketshare at this rate.
* The only caveat about margins is that we don't know if there are any bottlenecks going chiplet at binning and packaging. I'm inclined to think they are minimal since Zen2/3/4 have done very similar.