I just watched the Hardware Unboxed review.
The 7900XTX is only 25% faster across the 13 games they tested, that's including two games where it beat the 4090 by 5% at 4K.
The performance delta for the 7900XTX over the 6950XT was mostly around 15 to 20%, one or two cases even 0%, that's really odd, and way down from the +50 to 70% AMD claimed, HUB used a lot of the games AMD used in their slides and the results fell very much short of those claims.
Is this an indication of a problem with it? There are instances where the performance is phenomenal, beating the 4090, other instances where its frankly bad, but mostly when compared with the 6950XT clearly under-performing.
	
		
			
		
		
	
				
			The 7900XTX is only 25% faster across the 13 games they tested, that's including two games where it beat the 4090 by 5% at 4K.
The performance delta for the 7900XTX over the 6950XT was mostly around 15 to 20%, one or two cases even 0%, that's really odd, and way down from the +50 to 70% AMD claimed, HUB used a lot of the games AMD used in their slides and the results fell very much short of those claims.
Is this an indication of a problem with it? There are instances where the performance is phenomenal, beating the 4090, other instances where its frankly bad, but mostly when compared with the 6950XT clearly under-performing.
			
				Last edited: 
			
		
	
								
								
									
	
		
			
		
		
	
	
	
		
			
		
		
	
								
							
							 
	 
  
 
		 
 
		
 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		
 
						
					 
 
		 
 
		