• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

AMD smoother in games...

Status
Not open for further replies.
Soldato
Joined
6 Aug 2008
Posts
4,135
Location
Birmingham
I genuinly believe this, hence I run an AM3 gaming platform and atom and I7 for server type activities.. Nathraith closed the other thread as he called it BS...

Well I would point you

Here

http://www.tomshardware.co.uk/forum/257665-10-phenom-core-quad-q9550

And Anand tech

Interesting article!

http://www.anandtech.com/mb/showdoc.aspx?i=3506&p=1


Quote:
When it came to actual game play experiences, we thought the Phenom II 940 was clearly the better choice in Company of Heroes: Opposing Fronts and Crysis Warhead due to minimum frame rate advantages and fluidity of game play. In the five other titles, we could not tell any real differences in the quality of game play between the Phenom II 940 and Core 2 Quad Q9550. Except for Far Cry 2 where we could raise the graphic quality settings without affecting game play, the i7 platform was no different than our two other solutions.


And again

http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showthread.php?t=216514

So I would suggest that it is not BS and actually a lot of people actually think that although you can meausure "FPS" to daeth and I dont disagree that i7 benches higher, I just prefer to game on AM3 and Im not anti intel, i just bought a 980x from you this week!!!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom