• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

AMD “Steamroller” CPU cores coming in Q2 2013

/Facepalm.
Says Piledriver, which is meant to be Vishera, which has been touted this year.
That article is so conflicting it's not even funny and why I wish people didn't post pointless links.

Although, this could be that PD is coming 2013, which would be disappointing, I figured Vishera could slip to 2013, but I hope it hasn't.

Either way, Softpedia link with nothing in the OP and a misleading title.

Also, at 10% faster than Zambezi (By their own slide) they're lying, as their fastest core would still be Phenom II ones.

EDIT : Overall, stop linking and running away with articles you haven't read, especially softpedia.
 
Last edited:
Agh, rumours :p.
Trinity successor having a HD8000 is VERY plausible, and as mentioned, they could be throwing it out quicker (Although, the possibility of a SR core in them is left unknown, Llano didn't get a Zambezi core, wouldn't surprise me if they kept PD in it) due to Haswell trying to at least be somewhere competitive with AMD's APU's.
 
Martini1991 said:
Agh, rumours :p.
Trinity successor having a HD8000 is VERY plausible, and as mentioned, they could be throwing it out quicker (Although, the possibility of a SR core in them is left unknown, Llano didn't get a Zambezi core, wouldn't surprise me if they kept PD in it) due to Haswell trying to at least be somewhere competitive with AMD's APU's.
Click to expand...

Stop making idiotic assumptions, Just because Llano did not have Bulldozer cores is no indication of anything.

Its more lickley Trinity's successor would be SR cores as it looks like AMD are moving to TSMC for SR.
 
Last edited:
Sorry as soon as i realise anything is softpedia i don't bother they are completely hopeless at A, getting information and B, representing it in any useful way complete joke of a site should never be used as reference for anything. Hell if softpedia said the sky was blue and the grass was green i would look out my window to make sure something hadn't happened.
 
Do wish people would stop linking Softpedia. It should be banned as per other forums IMO.

Edit: Should've read earlier, already been flamed.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom