Soldato
The question is, 12core single ccd when?
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
The question is, 12core single ccd when?
Isn't zen 5c something like an ecore variant? Or am I completely wrong?16, Zen 5C
Isn't zen 5c something like an ecore variant? Or am I completely wrong?
I'm talking about the normal desktop x900 part having 12cores on a single ccd. Top it up with the 3d cache magic and I'm switching.
But that's not a proper desktop replacement I assume, from what I read (not much) it's supposed to be use for ultracomputers and stuff.They are low power cores but not in the same sense as Intel, they are actually full size cores just clocked lower, for data centre at least, they could be full clocked for desktop if AMD decide to use them for Desktop.
But that's not a proper desktop replacement I assume, from what I read (not much) it's supposed to be use for ultracomputers and stuff.
16 core CCD, Zen 5C
They are low power cores but not in the same sense as Intel, they are actually full size cores just clocked lower, for data centre at least, they could be full clocked for desktop if AMD decide to use them for Desktop.
Interesting....
6nm Zen3+ with a 5950X3D would be a very hot seller IMHO.They can, the question is will they. AMD would probably like to do more AM4 chips, but they would need to support all the AM4 chipsets, or they would be a lot of hate. The board makers would not like having to add support for new chips, they want to sell new stuff and forget about the older stuff.
6nm Zen3+ with a 5950X3D would be a very hot seller IMHO.
Instant buy for me.6nm Zen3+ with a 5950X3D would be a very hot seller IMHO.
Look like another 35% boost in performance tho....looks like AMD has realised there's not much point to go above 16 cores on the mainstream side so zen 5 will also just top off at that.
I feel like even 16 cores is probably a bit unnecessary, and if you really need the cores just go to threadripper which should start at 16 cores anyway.
its 2023 now, 6 cores should be the minimum, 8 the standard and 12 is ideal for all round use. as the recent X3D chips have proven, IPC gains and cache is more important than core count.
Developers target midrange hardware, if the midrange had 16 cores, software/games would use them. The hardware needs to be out before developers will target it. AMD should not stops adding cores or it will be the quad core stagnation again but this time 6/8 cores. They should add at least two cores per-CCD.looks like AMD has realised there's not much point to go above 16 cores on the mainstream side so zen 5 will also just top off at that.
I feel like even 16 cores is probably a bit unnecessary, and if you really need the cores just go to threadripper which should start at 16 cores anyway.
its 2023 now, 6 cores should be the minimum, 8 the standard and 12 is ideal for all round use. as the recent X3D chips have proven, IPC gains and cache is more important than core count.
Developers target midrange hardware, if the midrange had 16 cores, software/games would use them. The hardware needs to be out before developers will target it. AMD should not stops adding cores or it will be the quad core stagnation again but this time 6/8 cores. They should add at least two cores per-CCD.
I dont think they will continue to add P/E cores if AMD does not push them. Intel has proved that they are happy to do nothing if they can.The entry level i5 is currently at 10 cores. The i5 13500 is 14c 20t. Intel have been pushing core count hard for some time now.
The entry level i5 is currently at 10 cores. The i5 13500 is 14c 20t. Intel have been pushing core count hard for some time now.
For those who don't want to hear this man's annoying voice. In summary: Zen5 might have more L2 cache per core