I’m by no means an expert either but I think terminal velocity is dependent on mass of the object, and also drag co efficient.I'm no scientist, but surely 340 mph is greater than terminal velocity? The engines must have been running all the way down for it to drop that fast.

So sad, To see that one man who's lost his entire family on it holding a picture of his young daughter he will never see again is just heart breaking![]()
doesn't terminal velocity kinda refer to a freefalling object affected by mavity? i don't think it takes into account something like this - assumption! - as in a plane losing flight control and suddenly pointing downwards w/ its engines still helping it on its way.I’m by no means an expert either but I think terminal velocity is dependent on mass of the object, and also drag co efficient.
So I guess it would very much depend on how the aircraft is falling, in terms of angle of attack, nose level or nose down.
too many variables to calculate
Was the last one that made all the headlines found?
Nope just some odd bits washed up on some island that are probably from it.
Ta
I thought I'd seen a recent advert for a documentary on it and it said something like 'dredging the ocean'.
This is a very good documentary from one of my favourite youtubers:
I still think it went down somewhere around the estimated origin for the sound hereor towards the top of that ellipse - debris can also drift from there to Reunion.
Old airframe, poorly maintained and flown by pilots with limited training.
It does, but the post I was quoting was putting forward the theory that the engines must have been running and propelling the aircraft downwards otherwise terminal velocity wouldn't be enough to get it to the ground as quick as it did.doesn't terminal velocity kinda refer to a freefalling object affected by mavity? i don't think it takes into account something like this - assumption! - as in a plane losing flight control and suddenly pointing downwards w/ its engines still helping it on its way.
I'm no scientist, but surely 340 mph is greater than terminal velocity? The engines must have been running all the way down for it to drop that fast.
It does, but the post I was quoting was putting forward the theory that the engines must have been running and propelling the aircraft downwards otherwise terminal velocity wouldn't be enough to get it to the ground as quick as it did.
Wreckage and body parts found recently according to Reuters