https://www.tomshardware.co.uk/intel-disable-hyper-threading-spectre-attack,news-60647.html
Spectre again but a different variant
Spectre again but a different variant
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Dutch linkProtecting against the attack is also not easy. According to the researchers, this is a fundamental problem with the design of the chip. "Chips really have to go back to the drawing board," writes Herbert Bos, one of the researchers, in an email. "But the number of people at companies like Intel who deal with security at this level can really be counted on two fingers."
/edit/ Also a claim from Apple that full mitigation could decrease performance by up to 40%.![]()
On average it's less than that surely?Apple are just going to turn of Hyperthreading, same as ChromeOS, then. 40% is about what HT adds to performance.
Benchmark tables for upcoming cpu's over the next year or so might be rather worrying looking for team blue
So Intel now will have a flagship 8c/8t mainstream chip whereas AMD is about to release a 16c/32t chip lol. And Zen 3 will apparently have 4 threads per core. Intel be in such trouble.
Very good timing for AMD with Zen 2 to be announced hopefully in less than 2 weeks.
For some sitting on the fence this could be the final straw!
I genuinely don't think she is that kind of person. It is serendipitous timing yes. But I would imagine she wants success to come from AMD doing great things. Not because Intel F'ed up.Indeed. Lisa Su must be rubbing her hands together with glee.
Is this a real issues for home users?
Is this a real issues for home users?
Is this a real issues for home users?
You will see a 3% loss in performance.