Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
sup3rc0w said:I got 5100 earlier with the new Catalyst drivers![]()
Gonna do some tweaking, but I think the general consensus is that its a normal score. The PC seems to perform superbly under any circumstances.
Soon as I get new ram in here, I'll come back and show you girls hows its done![]()
jrodga2k5 said:Just curious though, whats the CPU score coming in at?
sup3rc0w said:I'll check tonight, BUT the CPU scores only chug along at 0-1 fps.
The first cpu test, the barren brown land thingy, only occasionally make 1 fps, and the second time they test it makes 1 fps more regularly.
This is bad i suppose![]()
AmaTeX said:
Pretty similar setup here:sup3rc0w said:Just got my new system up and running a few nights ago, and I have to say, I was very underwhelmed by the GFX card performance.
I got around 4960 3d Mark 06 @ 1280x1024
System specs
Intel Core 2 Duo E6300
Connect 3D X1900XT 256mb
2GB ram
Shuttle SD37P2
Are the scores rubbish, or am I just a bit out of touch with 3d mark benchmarking (haven't run it in years)
cheers
Sorry, I know it was a while ago but you're wrong. That was not bs. It does do all the things you said it does but it does improve framerates and I've experienced this myself. And it does remove stuttering especially with highend single card or SLI/Crossfire solutions.ernysmuntz said:BS
having more ram doesn't improve your frame rates, it just makes things load faster, stops game stuttering etc, allows you to do more at once without everything slowing down because of disk access etc.