So after FINALLY starting my new build (after picking up my lovely TJ07 for £100 yesterday) it's time I start narrowing the items down to go in it.
I was always a man to go with AMD, but for this build I've decided to go with Intel to see how things are on that side.
So it all bottles down to what it's used for. Primarily, gaming. I'm also starting to do a bit more 3D work and I'm usually dabbing around in Photoshop on most days too, but we'll stick with the gaming in mind.
As I said, I've decided to go Intel for this one, so what path would be best to take, bearing in mind it is primarily for gaming?
The choices I really see in front of me are either X58 (so either i7 930 or 950) or P55 (either i5 750/760 or i7 860/870). The plan is to overclock (you'd be mad not to right?), starting off with air and progressing onto a watercooled setup when funds allow. The extra 2GB of RAM that comes from the X58 route could be handy, but I'm not sure whether the extra cost would justify it, especially when it can be used in other areas.
Obviously a motherboard and RAM combination to match the above, and also a new PSU (although I'll probably go for one of the Antec New TruePowers that everyone is raving about) alongside a "medium sized" SSD (i.e. large enough for W7 and a few games to go on there) and a Sammy F3 for the extra storage.
The GPU can wait a month to see how the ATI 6xxx series turns out, so no need to worry there, yet. Hopefully I'll be able to stick to a single-card solution that's powerful enough, so the X16 X16 advantage of the X58 chipset shouldn't be taken into account, especially as there difference is extremely minimal, I am led to believe
Thoughts? Just remember it is primarily for gaming - most benchmarks I've looked at pitting the 750 against the 920 often results in the 750 on top - but that's at stock settings so the TurboBoost is simply the winning factor here. Take it that all the CPU's would be clocked to a nice ballpark figure, say 4.0GHz, just to even it up, what real-world performance differences will there be?
Cheers
I was always a man to go with AMD, but for this build I've decided to go with Intel to see how things are on that side.
So it all bottles down to what it's used for. Primarily, gaming. I'm also starting to do a bit more 3D work and I'm usually dabbing around in Photoshop on most days too, but we'll stick with the gaming in mind.
As I said, I've decided to go Intel for this one, so what path would be best to take, bearing in mind it is primarily for gaming?
The choices I really see in front of me are either X58 (so either i7 930 or 950) or P55 (either i5 750/760 or i7 860/870). The plan is to overclock (you'd be mad not to right?), starting off with air and progressing onto a watercooled setup when funds allow. The extra 2GB of RAM that comes from the X58 route could be handy, but I'm not sure whether the extra cost would justify it, especially when it can be used in other areas.
Obviously a motherboard and RAM combination to match the above, and also a new PSU (although I'll probably go for one of the Antec New TruePowers that everyone is raving about) alongside a "medium sized" SSD (i.e. large enough for W7 and a few games to go on there) and a Sammy F3 for the extra storage.
The GPU can wait a month to see how the ATI 6xxx series turns out, so no need to worry there, yet. Hopefully I'll be able to stick to a single-card solution that's powerful enough, so the X16 X16 advantage of the X58 chipset shouldn't be taken into account, especially as there difference is extremely minimal, I am led to believe

Thoughts? Just remember it is primarily for gaming - most benchmarks I've looked at pitting the 750 against the 920 often results in the 750 on top - but that's at stock settings so the TurboBoost is simply the winning factor here. Take it that all the CPU's would be clocked to a nice ballpark figure, say 4.0GHz, just to even it up, what real-world performance differences will there be?
Cheers
Last edited: