Any FSX fans here?

Associate
Joined
16 Sep 2010
Posts
11
I am going to get a new system and I want to be able to ramp up the settings on Flight Simulator X. As every FSX fan will know it is still probably the most graphics intensive game on the market. I have been doing some digging and it seems the game is much more CPU reliant that GPU. However I am not really up to speed on the matter. As such would I better going for high end CPU and more RAM, rather than the high end GPUs on the market?

Thanks for any help.
 
It doesn't handle multiple cores well at all so single threaded performance is the ticket.

It may essentially be a single threaded app but the service packs did allow the use of multiple cores and with it brought a large performance increase. However I bet there are no fast single core CPUs around these days ;)

My real point is ALWAYS install the service packs for FSX (or Acceleration)
 
I would HIGHLY recommend you read my FSX thread Devrij mentioned, in there I posted a few links on how to improve FSX performance. Many of these links will also discuss what hardware suits best for FSX as you need to consider CPU/GPU/RAM/HD/SSD/OS etc. So before you splash out your hard earned cash, make sure you know what you are getting and know how to get the most out of FSX. It can be a beast and a source of much frustration but once you tame it, it can be a real pleasure to use for many years to come.

Best of luck.


PS as far as multicore usage goes when it comes to FSX: upgrading and patching FSX with either both service packs or Acceleration (which includes both packs) is sound advice. It gives many improvements one of them being that it brings in 'limited' multicore usage. From what I have read, the patches makes some of the processing of FSX (like autogen) work on a second processor if there is one available. Again from what I have read, the multicore implementation is not up to nowadays game's standard, AFAIK FSX only uses 2 cores maximum, it is other applications/resource or addons that would utilize the 3rd and 4th core. So yes it uses multicore but it still relies heavy on RAW CPU power, I see no evidence atm that two identical PCs, one with a 4Ghz Dual core and the other with a 4Ghz Quad core will run FSX any faster. The ONLY difference would be what else you run on that system at the same time as running FSX that would benefit from a quad core so it would be less likely to interfere with FSX needs for CPU cycles. IMO going for the highest clocked quad core would ATM make the best sense (you could save money and get a similar clocked dual core but then you have to be very careful on how you tweak FSX and what other processes you run while using FSX - I tend to use a 2nd PC via both widefs and simconnect to handle several FSX 3rd party addons in order to take the load of the FSX PC plus I keep the FSX PC very very clean in term of processes and resources). ATM I cannot see any sense in spending money a more expensive CPU that contains more then 4 cores, again, unless you are doing more then just FSX on that PC. Hope that helps.
 
Last edited:
FSX will use more than 2 cores, if you look at Task Manager's performance tab the main core used by FSX will generally be 100% busy with the other cores all jumping up and down in a very similar fashion. Note however that FSX will only use real cores, it ignores the HyperThreading ones that many Intel chips have these days.
 
Definitely check out the shader model fix on avsim. Makes a huge difference.

I don't use many tweaks really. Just bufferpools, affinity mask and the shader mod fix.
 
Definitely recommend getting the acceleration pack at the very least for the service packs. What I'd say is that FSX can be hugely frustrating and you can spends days on end, tweaking and messing around trying to improve your frame rates.

Word of advice, for the FPS, if it looks good and smooth....go and enjoy it!
 
I have been reading the thread (thanks for the link), but i am at work right now i will read it in more detail when i get home.

I have been playing the flight sims for years. I have FSX accel and 4-5 add-ons. I have not upgraded my PC for a couple of years, my last upgrade being a 8800GTX. At the time i was amazed to see how little it did for the game. However it makes sense now given that i now know the game is CPU based.

Anyway it is time for new system. FSX is the only game i really play, other than that the system will be used to run Visual Studio and XNA. However i might just use my old system for that. Bottom line is i am going to get a system specifically to run FSX. I plan on spending about 12-1300 but i need to get a monitor too. If i cant get a system for that then i will hold off for 6 months and get one later.
 
Back
Top Bottom