• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Any use for a 3.06 p4 nowadays?

Associate
Joined
18 Mar 2009
Posts
876
Location
Indiana, United States.
Hey mates,
I have an old hyper threaded p4 cpu and was thinking about buying the biostar mobo for it as it's only around 60USD and would allow me to use ddr2, and pci express 16x, not to mention OC it to around 3.4-3.6ghz.

My question is would there be any point to bringing it back to life? Can you game on a p4? Or do a lot of the newer games require a better cpu? How much difference would there be between this chip and the worst dual core?
 
A Core 2 Duo at 2ghz is as fast as a Pentium D clocked at 4ghz, so a Pentium 4 is going to be left a long way behind. I think mobo manufacturers are slowly dropping Pentium support anyway.
 
Is it a Northwood core or a Prescott core? Socket 478?

I think 1080p is out of the question really... They are about the same performance, if not better than the Atom.
 
I think 1080p is out of the question really... They are about the same performance, if not better than the Atom.

What?!

You're having a laugh, a 3Gig P4 is quite a bit faster than the Atom.
To answer the question being it's the single core Pentium 4 it won't be very quick at anything, but 1080p decoding is well within its reach.

The only recent comparison I've seen was on Anandtech, it compared a P4 that's faster than yours, but you can still see the performance difference.
http://www.anandtech.com/bench/default.aspx?p=91&p2=92
The only areas the Atom comes close is in video, and that's because it's offloaded to the Nvidia ION platform iirc.
 
Last edited:
Yeah, my old Pentium M 2.13ghz (supposedly equivalent to a 3ghz P4) definitely couldn't handle 1080p.

I have a system at home with a 2.66ghz Northwood P4 and that won't even deal with 720p.
 
I finally got off working with a dual P4 3.6GHz machine (Xeons really) and it was surprisingly capable even with lots of multitasking. You should have a decent experience with a single-core 3.06. It's gonna be FAR better than an Atom machine (ignoring power usage!).

Thing is, I've been 'upgraded' to a 3.0GHz quad-core C2Q-based Xeon and it feels like a DOG. I hate it so much that I'm tempted to go back to the P4 Xeons!
 
I finally got off working with a dual P4 3.6GHz machine (Xeons really) and it was surprisingly capable even with lots of multitasking. You should have a decent experience with a single-core 3.06. It's gonna be FAR better than an Atom machine (ignoring power usage!).

Thing is, I've been 'upgraded' to a 3.0GHz quad-core C2Q-based Xeon and it feels like a DOG. I hate it so much that I'm tempted to go back to the P4 Xeons!

Really?

I have a pair of twin 3.6Ghz Menon XW8200 workstations with 4gb RAM each at work, any my Q6600, evne with 4gb RAM, is like a rocketship in comparison to them, even after fresh installs of XP and Ubuntu.

Something must be seriously up with your new box!
 
Oh totally. But it's so locked down that I can't try and sort it out! I tell the IT dudes and they're like "make sure themes are disabled - they can slow your machine down a bit". Uh-huh. (machine in sig)
Tbh I'm blaming the virus checker. It's constantly checking files (and I'm often working with thousands of tiny files). The slowness is something I can't place, but I really hate using that machine!
 
Sounds like a really crappy works build - I should know, I make good ones ;) - so throw rocks at your IT crowd until they either give in, or die from their injuries.

More realistically, if you're sure it's the AV doing a scan, ask them to set the scan to run at 7pm [or whenever you have left] and to automagically kill the machine afterwards.

Or to send a magic pakcet to turn the machine on at 6am and scan then - get it out of the way.

Or the rocks.

I know which I'd prefer...
 
They are still fast enough as office machines and most games WILL work on them, though obviously they are very dated by now.
 
They are still fast enough as office machines and most games WILL work on them, though obviously they are very dated by now.


True to a degree, but I have a 2.8Ghz Northwood, CPU and mobo sitting here, and I can't be arsed hooking it up to something becauseI could do a saturday at work, and from that, have the money to get a faster CPU and mobo/RAM. Probably brand new. And I'm not gloating about my pay rate [whcih isn't all that otherwise I'd have an i7, not a Q6600!], it's just that the game has moved on so much.

Still, passive heatsink, perspex case wall mounted, CMOS clock based alarm and a script to start up winamp, and have a sleep button that actually sends it to sleep...and you'd have a reasonable, rather 'different' alarm clock!
 
Yeah, my old Pentium M 2.13ghz (supposedly equivalent to a 3ghz P4) definitely couldn't handle 1080p.

I have a system at home with a 2.66ghz Northwood P4 and that won't even deal with 720p.

I've got a 1.6ghz Pentium M that just manages 720p, can't have too many programs running though or sound gets unsynced :(, maybe its the rams fault 512mb gets filled quicky style.
 
I have a Pentium 4 HT 3ghz on my old pc, and it can playback 720p. I think it's a matter of the right codecs and settings tbh :P
 
I have an old 3GHz P4 Northwood, 720p works, 1080p doesn't. It's using an old 9800PRO. The chip's power consumption should rule out any HTPC and NAS duties. I'd say junk it.
 
I have an old P4 3Ghz machine, runs 2GB of RAM and an AGP ATi X800pro GFx card. Will Run BF2, 2142 and Cod4 on almost all high settings at 1440x900. Any bigger Res and it'll struggle. Obviously it's no good for newer games but if you like a lot of old classics it's worth it.
 
Back
Top Bottom