Anyone else think Warhawk needs to be rebalanced?

Associate
Joined
29 Nov 2006
Posts
470
Location
The Mo0n
From a ground POV it's pointless...

Pistol may aswell be a BB gun...
Machine gun is ok but aiming the thing can be a nightmare (You basically watch autoaim do it for you)
Rocket launcher seems ok I guess.
Using ground turret/Jeep turrets is a complete joke lol.
Flak cannon/Missile launcher seem pretty well balanced for air, Using the Flak cannon against ground units heading towards your base seems to have little effort on them.It takes almost an entire clip to kill a MAN lol

Air POV.

Targeting enemy troops...Takes about a million shots with machinegun or a good few rockets JUST to kill a man:eek:

Jeeps are almost as bad as shooting troops, It takes way to many shoots to destory it hardly seems worth the effort chasing it =/

W/E I've not mentioned I'm most likely happy with:p

I've had this game since it first came out, It was great for the first few days but then it starts to feel very limited when you've played Battlefield series(PC).

It really feels like it needs some new stuff thrown at it to make it feel fresh.It needs more purpose and more variety to keep me playing it.

I think what I'm saying is this...I've had BF2 sicne it came out and I'm still not bored of it!You have so many options and every map is different:)

Warhawk is basically you trying to get a plane ASAP and thats it!Unless your actually playing the game and trying to capture the flags which nobody ever seems to bother with...
 
Your sigs too big. Breaks the rules.

I have nothing to add to the thread. Just wanted to give you the heads up
 
Back
Top Bottom