• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Anyone ever run old 3D benches to test the latest hardware against your oldschool gfx

32,942 in '03 http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=5650465
58,474 in '01 http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=9126653

compared to:
34,484 in 01 (x800gto2) http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=9126653
21,493 in 01 (9700pro) http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=8345568
16,783 in 01 (sofmodded 9500) http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=7070902
7,924 in 01 (x300 onboard:p) http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=8977407
6,058 in 01 (gf4 mx440) http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=3958232

erm, thats about it really. single gtx for my current scores
 
Last edited:
How about this one :)

fr_Score-1.jpg


For reference a Voodoo2 SLI rig would have got a score of around 4-5 marks.
 
03 is more GFX card dependent, I get 48K with one Ultra and 72K with SLI.

When 03 was first released they compared a celeron to the AXP using the same GFX card and the scores were about the same.

thats right. we are seeing a trend here though. what starts as gpu limit becomes cpu limited the further we move forward. '05 was gpu limited, to the point where the cpu's were making little difference. but the faster your gpu is, the bigger the difference the cpu makes to the score.
 
Back
Top Bottom