• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Anyone noticed a low load in task manger with q6600?

kchakkar

kchakkar

kchakkar

Associate
Joined
3 May 2004
Posts
473
Location
UK
Just upgraded to the q6600 from a Presler 930 and in task manager in the performance tab the usage fluctuates between 4% to 18%. With the presler it was 16% to 64%. This is with opera running with 30 tabs and programs like word 2007, dreamweaver 8, IE 6 and firefox all running.

Upon putting my hand on the 2 x120mm fan grill(at the top of my case), I notice no heat coming out. With the presler there was a lot of heat and I had to turn the fans on. Now with the q6600 I can leave them off, less noise now.

Can't wait when the octo cores come out :D
 
Thats one wicked pr0n addiction there dude! :D

alphaomega16 said:
30 Tabs WTF you browsing lol

Also I would like to enquire as to why you are running PC5300 instead of PC6400 ?
Click to expand...

Would'nt matter much as hes not o'cin it seems :) Even PC4200 would be fine since its a 1066FSB cpu.
 
Last edited:
alphaomega16 said:
30 Tabs WTF you browsing lol

Also I would like to enquire as to why you are running PC5300 instead of PC6400 ?
Click to expand...


I prefer to have all the links like overclockers, information websites, finance pages etc open as soon as I open opera. I also do programming and trying to look for a website you looked at yesterday can be annoying, therefore I prefer to leave it in a tab. It does consume around 500mb though :eek:

I'm happy with the quad compared to the presler. I ran C&C Tib Wars and loading was very quick. I think the AI has improved, because I can't destroy their base lol.
 
kchakkar said:
I ran C&C Tib Wars and loading was very quick. I think the AI has improved, because I can't destroy their base lol.
Click to expand...
looks like someone just got overran by the updated AI (started from patch1.05) me and my mate also got crashed by 2 brutal the other day........ our MCVs met in the middle ground of our 2 bases, with 100's scorpion tanks closing in, lol. :p

are your CPU load spread evenly across 4 cores?
and what OS are you running?
 
wuyanxu said:
looks like someone just got overran by the updated AI (started from patch1.05) me and my mate also got crashed by 2 brutal the other day........ our MCVs met in the middle ground of our 2 bases, with 100's scorpion tanks closing in, lol. :p

are your CPU load spread evenly across 4 cores?
and what OS are you running?
Click to expand...


I had around 20 APC's crushed :p . I am currently using Windows XP Pro, but will put Vista ultimate on over the weekend on my 2 x raptor RAID 1. Just need to finish my ASP.NET code by Friday.

The load is spread across four cores. On core 1 and 2 there is small usage. Core three has the highest usage and core 4 has the lowest usage. If I were to estimate in percentage terms: 1 = 6% 2 =6% 3 = 25% 4 =2%
 
I found (when I went fairly recently) to dual core a 4%-16% almost see-saw pattern (alternating fairly crisply between the 2 every 2/3 seconds). Did a full driver check and it seems to have cleared up.
I do notice my machine is a fair bit slower seeking when I open stuff not to hijack but is that one of the joys of multi-core too?
 
Mercutio said:
I found (when I went fairly recently) to dual core a 4%-16% almost see-saw pattern (alternating fairly crisply between the 2 every 2/3 seconds). Did a full driver check and it seems to have cleared up.
I do notice my machine is a fair bit slower seeking when I open stuff not to hijack but is that one of the joys of multi-core too?
Click to expand...


I noticed the see-saw pattern, but not a slow down.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom