anyone speak czech? (possible crysis benchmark)

joe pineapples · 18 Apr 2007 at 15:15

no idea if this is fake or not, but over on http://games.tiscali.cz, a crysis benchmark has popped up (news item - scroll down), between an 8800 GTX (768meg) and a HD X2900XT (512meg). Rest of the system spec is also included.

mcwildcard · 18 Apr 2007 at 15:19

Direct link: http://games.tiscali.cz/news/news.asp?id=22013
Benchies:

Make of it what you will...

SteveOBHave · 18 Apr 2007 at 15:22

If accurate that looks like quite a nice gain...

Edit - I'd be curious to know if a Crysis demo even exists let alone in the same room with the ATI card... seems dubious the more I think about it.

FirebarUK · 18 Apr 2007 at 15:39

I suppose that given Gibbo's reaction to the card (he was kinda impressed, kinda 'muh') I'd say those benchmarks are certainly possible. Is the HD 2900XT the R600 edition that Gibbo had a hands on with?

fornowagain · 18 Apr 2007 at 15:46

http://forums.overclockers.co.uk/showpost.php?p=9123653&postcount=1056

fakes btw

mmj_uk · 18 Apr 2007 at 15:48

Also would be worth knowing if the 8800GTX is a bog standard reference card or an OC version.

LoadsaMoney · 18 Apr 2007 at 16:05

Migh start a poll on how many thimes this is going to get posted, minimum will be 10.

joe pineapples · 18 Apr 2007 at 16:08

Migh start a poll on how many thimes this is going to get posted, minimum will be 10

well, clearly some peeps hadnt seen it, and theres always the option not to read it

Elrein · 18 Apr 2007 at 16:16

2 fps @ 1600x1200

@ my resolution of 1920x1200 if all those benchies are close to the truth my 8800GTX is gunna reign supreme

and without the BS wait all the ATi guys have been holding on 4 (yes i used to run ATi but i gave up waiting)

Darg · 18 Apr 2007 at 16:59

Well there's no reason to assume that just because the marks get closer as the res go up that the nVidia card would actually beat the ATi. More likely is that the difference would be just 1fps or something like that. 41 and 40 or something.

queamin · 18 Apr 2007 at 17:18

If it true like to see what the 1 gig xtx does or what ever it called

queamin · 18 Apr 2007 at 17:20

might keep the 320 if the chart right as the 320 should be playable around 1360 x 768 for me, well i hope

Elrein · 18 Apr 2007 at 17:25

Darg said:
Well there's no reason to assume that just because the marks get closer as the res go up that the nVidia card would actually beat the ATi. More likely is that the difference would be just 1fps or something like that. 41 and 40 or something.

/agree

If the ATi solution is a lot better i for one will be switching but from early reports im pretty happy my $604 went to nVidia

Marky · 18 Apr 2007 at 17:30

No these are fake benchmarks:

http://www.bilgiustam.com/resimler/donanim/test2.jpg
and
http://img215.imageshack.us/img215/1773/crysistest1kr1.jpg

- Marky

Azza · 18 Apr 2007 at 17:35

Well the fact that I think Crysis is still in its Alpha (correct me if im wrong) stage may be something to go by.

And also the whole driver support for the game and R600/G80 in XP and Vista/DX10.

Cyber-Mav · 18 Apr 2007 at 17:57

doesn;t seem to be a huge drop in framerate going from 1024x768 to 1600x1200 with 4xAA and 16xAF, bit shocking that. from looks alone i would guess that there could be cpu limitation there. but not enough info to confirm that.

HighlandeR · 18 Apr 2007 at 18:10

lol definate fakes.... in fact crysis team are using the only DX10 available card as a form of reference for there Crysis game which is the 8800 GTX.

Chances are its gonna be built/optimised for Nvidia better over ATI.

FirebarUK · 18 Apr 2007 at 18:44

Pity, as Far Cry wubbed ATI to the max.

Firegod · 18 Apr 2007 at 19:27

Don't believe that graph for one minute. Anyone one can post up b*llocks like this.

Participant · 18 Apr 2007 at 19:40

SteveOBHave said:
If accurate that looks like quite a nice gain...

?!