Anyone still after a Playstation 3?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Soldato
Joined
30 Nov 2003
Posts
3,612
As long as you don't mind it being from America, now is the time to buy one.

With the exchange rate being £1 = $2 if you find the right deal on the bay then you can get cheap.

Mate just got his for $500 with 1 game and a dvd which is £250 :) (including shipping and sent as a gift to try avoid the import tax :P )
 
Last edited:
I'd rather not risk import tax and warranty as these things run damn hot I have no idea how they will cope after 10 months use.

I'll get a UK one when they are down to a reasonable price (probably 360 premium launch price).
 
wwwebber said:
Ha ha - someone else who wants something for nothing :rolleyes:

Actually more like someone who doesn't want to pay the hefty price tag, especially when they have a 360 which fits their gaming needs and nothing new is offered with the PS3 bar Blue Ray. Until more games come out and more exclusive ones, then some people are going to be the same.

I'm going to wait until christmas for mine, when it's dropped as tbh im not bothered about blueray and other than a game or two the 360 hasn't got i don't consider it worthy of it's price. That's my opinion though, so i'll wait until it's feet are firmly of the ground before ploughing my money into one and also when it's price is more acceptable for what "I" need it for.
 
v1bez said:
Actually more like someone who doesn't want to pay the hefty price tag, especially when they have a 360 which fits their gaming needs and nothing new is offered with the PS3 bar Blue Ray. Until more games come out and more exclusive ones, then some people are going to be the same.

I'm going to wait until christmas for mine, when it's dropped as tbh im not bothered about blueray and other than a game or two the 360 hasn't got i don't consider it worthy of it's price. That's my opinion though, so i'll wait until it's feet are firmly of the ground before ploughing my money into one and also when it's price is more acceptable for what "I" need it for.

I see your point but expecting it to be cheap when it has a built in HD, wireless networking, blu-ray with free online gaming is a bit much. If you don't want any of these features then it is not for you anyway.
 
Kreeeee said:
I'd rather not risk import tax and warranty as these things run damn hot I have no idea how they will cope after 10 months use.

I'll get a UK one when they are down to a reasonable price (probably 360 premium launch price).

There does seem to be a high level of pedantic posters on here at the moment, there is nothing wrong with Kreee wanting a PS3 at a cheaper price, who wouldnt? I paid £425 for mine, but would have rather paid £280 for it, im sure everyone would have, some people are happy to wait for it to come down (which is will), others want it now and pay the premium, its the way its always been. The rolly eyes were uncalled for wwwebber.
 
wwwebber said:
I see your point but expecting it to be cheap when it has a built in HD, wireless networking, blu-ray with free online gaming is a bit much. If you don't want any of these features then it is not for you anyway.

lol, what a load of rubbish. How about the fact it plays games? Maybe that is what he wants it for, being a gaming console and all.
 
Simmz said:
As long as you don't mind it being from America, now is the time to buy one.

With the exchange rate being £1 = $2 if you find the right deal on the bay then you can get cheap.

Mate just got his for $500 with 1 game and a dvd which is £250 :) (including shipping and sent as a gift to try avoid the import tax :P )

where? :)
 
ScarySquirrel said:
lol, what a load of rubbish. How about the fact it plays games? Maybe that is what he wants it for, being a gaming console and all.

Come on, start thinking - if he wants to play games on a cheaper machine then he needs to get a 360 or a Wii. The PS3 comes with a lot of hardware by default and thus the price.

That was my point.
 
wwwebber said:
I see your point but expecting it to be cheap when it has a built in HD, wireless networking, blu-ray with free online gaming is a bit much. If you don't want any of these features then it is not for you anyway.

So basically if i don't want blu-ray then i should forget the PS3 altogether, that's a bit stupid considering before most it's a GAMING machine then a media system. It's like i don't need the wireless adapter, i have a router next to my 360 and could easily connect another cable to the ps3.

That doesn't mean because i don't want the wireless networking then i don't need the console. I have the money to buy a PS3, i could buy one right now if i wanted to.
The reason i don't is as i've already stated, the game's don't interest me, the blu-ray doesn't interest me so why can't i wait to get it cheaper without being branded someone who wants something for nothing.

I bought the PS1/PS2 on release and to be quite honest the reason i did there was no competition so i could warrant the money. Where as the 360 in my eyes is superior at this moment in time due to the games collection it has. When the PS3 gains more games and drops to a price that i feel is right, i'll buy it seeing as it's first and formost a games console and at the moment i just don't see it as a worth the money it's being sold for.
 
wwwebber said:
Come on, start thinking - if he wants to play games on a cheaper machine then he needs to get a 360 or a Wii. The PS3 comes with a lot of hardware by default and thus the price.

That was my point.


Fair enough, i misunderstood. Sorry.
 
wwwebber said:
Come on, start thinking - if he wants to play games on a cheaper machine then he needs to get a 360 or a Wii. The PS3 comes with a lot of hardware by default and thus the price.

That was my point.

I think Kreeeee already has a Wii and 360, don't hold me on that though.

Some people have all three, some people have one if not two. It's all down to personal preference, some people see it as a media machine and game's console and go about saying they payed £200 for the blu-ray and £200 for the console.

All in all it's what you think the console is worth, this determines if you'll buy it or not or wait until it drops in price in the future.
 
wwwebber said:
Come on, start thinking - if he wants to play games on a cheaper machine then he needs to get a 360 or a Wii. The PS3 comes with a lot of hardware by default and thus the price.

That was my point.

He already owns both the 360 + Wii so I dont see the point your trying to make :confused: Because he doesnt want to spend £500 on a PS3 + accessories/games just to play a few games that arent out yet he shouldn't want one period?

Theres nothing unreasonable about wanting it for less when its damn expensive US+Japan sell them for £250-£300 which is what I would consider reasonable. Why throw £425 down the drain for a console he wont use when he can get it much cheaper a year down the line?
 
wwwebber said:
I see your point but expecting it to be cheap when it has a built in HD, wireless networking, blu-ray with free online gaming is a bit much. If you don't want any of these features then it is not for you anyway.


Who cares what it has "Built in" Kreeeee said he will not be willing to fork out until the price is right for him.

You do realise that consoles drop in price through out their life time.

BTW how is it something for nothing? That could be about the stupidest remark ever, it will be a PS3 for about £280 :rolleyes:

Sony are looking in the short term to make a profit through games and blurays and in the long term once they have improved their manufacturing process they will begin to make a profit on the consoles themselves.
 
kalanium said:
He already owns both the 360 + Wii so I dont see the point your trying to make :confused: Because he doesnt want to spend £500 on a PS3 + accessories/games just to play a few games that arent out yet he shouldn't want one period?

Theres nothing unreasonable about wanting it for less when its damn expensive US+Japan sell them for £250-£300 which is what I would consider reasonable. Why throw £425 down the drain for a console he wont use when he can get it much cheaper a year down the line?

Exactly my point, why buy it now for a few game's not even out yet when it can be bought when they come out for a far cheaper price?
 
wwwebber said:
I see your point but expecting it to be cheap when it has a built in HD, wireless networking, blu-ray with free online gaming is a bit much. If you don't want any of these features then it is not for you anyway.


its a GAMES console - the rest is added extras. the price will undoubtedly drop before christmas, when its also more likely there will be games out that people want to play.

so the PS3 has something for everyone, just not at its current price and not with its current catalogue of games.
 
gjrc said:
its a GAMES console - the rest is added extras. the price will undoubtedly drop before christmas, when its also more likely there will be games out that people want to play.

so the PS3 has something for everyone, just not at its current price and not with its current catalogue of games.


hmm not everyone sees it as a games console. i have a mate who looking to get it for just the blueray/dvd and internet/multimedia aspect of it. hes not a gamer at all and doesn't want a pc . but the ps3 will allow him to do surfing
 
TALON1973 said:
hmm not everyone sees it as a games console. i have a mate who looking to get it for just the blueray/dvd and internet/multimedia aspect of it. hes not a gamer at all and doesn't want a pc . but the ps3 will allow him to do surfing

Yeah the thing is it's actually a games console thats the main thing it does hence it's first and formost a games console. The blu-ray is just an added extra. Don't get me wrong it might be a good blu-ray player but you can get them stand alone you can't with the ps3 it's connected to a games console.
 
v1bez said:
that's a bit stupid considering before most it's a GAMING machine
.

No it isnt - every ps3 advert is pushing the fact its actually everything rolled into one - one "activity / role" doesnt take priority - according to Sony at any rate

I do find it interesting that the x360 was more like a pc than any console before it (ie each user could add bits they wanted and ignore other parts) and customers think this is good (even with higher add on prices) - Im not including the hd-dvd drive as that has nothing to do with gaming

Nearly every console prior to this was identical as it came the same whereever you bought it, yes you could buy add on controllers and cameras etc but the basic unit was the same.

Sony try and do this, and build a machine for 5 - 10 year life span and they get critisized by making one unit with all the abilities most people use along with the lifespan people expect.

I really cant see the X360 lasting too many years more without a major update to the BASIC model (I honestly reckon before its retired the 360 will have to offer hdmi as default )

Not to mention the fact there seem to be serious design flaws inherrant in the model - due to the sheer numbers of returns /faults

Forza 2 may well change my aspect but at this time I havent been interested in my 360 for 9 months or so, and the PS3 has seriously impressed me with its design, quietness, build quality and all round abilities. I know consoles are sold at a loss for the majority of their lives (isnt the PS2 the only one ever to have made a profit?) but to get this kind of kit for sub £300 is laughable without major cost savings - which in itself could cause numerous problems for the consumer.

I fully respect people like choice - but that goes back to my initial views that the x360 was more a pc, consoles were never meant to be like that.

Good on Ms for having the vision - and maybe Im being too synical thinking MS did it this way to actually make more money from the addons than they could ever get away with built in - who knows

I also fully repsect that if you are only interested in games then currently the PS3 probably isnt for you - there are some great games, but probably not enough choice or variance to make this console a "must have" ......yet

Hopefully this isnt seen as a "baiting" or flaming post, as that was not at all what was intended
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom