apollo photos diseceted

mrk · 27 Oct 2011 at 14:15

Since you've saved the image has been flattened the answer is no, you cannot see what was or is underneath the black.

In order to do what you're asking you have to have the image saved with layers so it has to be saved in one of the compatible formats, tiff, psd etc.

Glaucus · 27 Oct 2011 at 14:17

Then what is the ops video doing with jpegs?

Cosimo · 27 Oct 2011 at 14:30

AcidHell2 said:
Then what is the ops video doing with jpegs?

Unless he has obtained the original scans of the negatives used in the missions then he will be using jpegs.

Here is a interesting link about Apollo 11 Image Library:

http://next.nasa.gov/alsj/a11/images11.html

(bookmarked for reading)

megakid · 27 Oct 2011 at 14:34

dmpoole said:
I'll have to put this question in Photography or somewhere

I'm no photo image expert but if you've painted over the picture with a black 'brush' in something like Paint or Photoshop then no - you have physically lost the 1s and 0s data that is underneath. If poorly done, the easy thing to detect is if someone has cloned, merged or fabricated part of a photo. With extra analysis you can see what part is fabricated and hence see the generic outline of the fabricated part and potentially work out what was covered up, if anything.

As example, if you merged in some sky from another photo, you could tell with extra analysis that the sky and foreground were from different photographs (based on their brightness, exposure and other measures).

Firestar_3x · 27 Oct 2011 at 14:35

School holidays.........

badcompany · 27 Oct 2011 at 14:36

How can he be it was just stated u need multi layer files

RomanNose · 27 Oct 2011 at 14:37

Firestar_3x said:
School holidays.........

We are not all guilty of the OPs hideous thought crimes.

EdGey · 27 Oct 2011 at 14:41

There are glass buildings on the moon.

mrk · 27 Oct 2011 at 14:42

Then what is the ops video doing with jpegs?

Clutching at straws.

markweatherill · 27 Oct 2011 at 14:43

Did someone desecrate a temple or something?

Cosimo · 27 Oct 2011 at 14:44

mrk said:
Clutching at straws.

Indeed, it's what all the disbelievers do!

Cosimo · 27 Oct 2011 at 14:45

markweatherill said:
Did someone desecrate a temple or something?

The thread would have been more interesting if they had.

Delvis · 27 Oct 2011 at 15:00

I can't believe Mr.Blobby made it on to the last bit of the film reel, no wonder they covered that part up.

doodah · 27 Oct 2011 at 15:05

LabR@t - you need only ask groen for the definitive answer!

Monkeymatt · 27 Oct 2011 at 15:20

AcidHell2 said:
The stair case looks absolutely nothing like a stair case.
Looks more like a tank and dust cloud.

And CTs suck.

There is a huge mountain of evidence for moon landings.

Exactly what I thought. Since when do buildings have long barrel shaped objects attached that are almost the same length as the rest of the building? I don't care if it's the moon and it has less gravity it would be pointless.

This yet again proves that youtube idiots are remain as idiotic as ever.

Glaucus · 27 Oct 2011 at 15:29

mrk said:
Clutching at straws.

Well yeah, but it would be nice for someone to explain what he's doing and what it is showing.

Cosimo · 27 Oct 2011 at 15:44

AcidHell2 said:
Well yeah, but it would be nice for someone to explain what he's doing and what it is showing.

The last comment helps:

With all due respect, as a pro photographer of several decades and extensive experience with film scanning, all I see are scanning artifacts and a few chemical sploches. By expanding contrast ranges all sorts of artifacts and patterns will appear on any low key film scans. You are not the first to make these errors and I suspect you will not be the last.

TommyV · 27 Oct 2011 at 15:51

star wars is real

ShortWarning · 27 Oct 2011 at 16:08

I'm with dmpoole. CS threads are some on my favourites on OCUK. The less believable the better!

spudbynight · 27 Oct 2011 at 16:10

Azza said:
I got myself one of the ole Vanilla flavour ones, forgot how good they were!

Anyone else try the french Coca Cola Blak when it was available? It was the best.