Apology

[linktoinsanity]

I'd keep the 295 if I had one too. The Nvidias outperform the atis atm as far as I know, but price : performance ratio is really in atis favour.

Depends what you want really. Performance = Nvidia. Value = ATI.

 

[Admiral Huddy]

And what vacuum would you choose Link?

 

[Greebo]

And what vacuum would you choose Link?

Miele for the win every time. Dyson sucks!

 

[philip j fry]

Although nvidia cards seem to have better performance in general ATI are atm the best bang for buck and tbh they dont fall that far behind nvidia in terms of performance, so tbh i would say atm ati are the better cards untill nvidia decide to drop there prices to compete.
As for hovers the henry beats all others hands down every time

 

[something daft already!!]

Miele for the win every time. Dyson sucks!

Nothing sucks like an Electrolux.

I used to know a lady rep from that company who wore an old badge that said that. It used to be their advertising slogan many years ago. Many a titter was had.

 

[AMG]

ATI are best for price to performaces, and they are not very far behind nvida in performace if any at all unless you compare them to the GTX295. but look at the price you have to pay for that *extra* if any in a crossfire set up