AQUAERO 5 vs 6

As above , the 6 has full pwm support and a slightly updated front panel, i have both, the lack of pwm support on the 5 was a pain as my pwm fans would 'tick' when powered on a 3 pin.
 
Oh ok, so I have 8 pwm fans. At the moment I have all 8 pwm fans on a pwm splitter with a power adapter so they don’t lose power. If I connected the splitter to the 1 pwm port on the Aquaero 5 would this be sufficient? Or would the auaero 6 be better?
 
Oh ok, so I have 8 pwm fans. At the moment I have all 8 pwm fans on a pwm splitter with a power adapter so they don’t lose power. If I connected the splitter to the 1 pwm port on the Aquaero 5 would this be sufficient? Or would the auaero 6 be better?
Yes that would still work. You'd just bring the PWM control signal out of the Aquaero on its own, same as how it's been working for you so far. But then what function is the Aquaero really performing for you?
 
Oh ok, so I have 8 pwm fans. At the moment I have all 8 pwm fans on a pwm splitter with a power adapter so they don’t lose power. If I connected the splitter to the 1 pwm port on the Aquaero 5 would this be sufficient? Or would the auaero 6 be better?
I don't think having all fans controlled by single signal is best idea.
For example would be better to control different fans depending on different temperatures.
No sense to make all fans increase speed if say only CPU is creating heat to case and not graphics card which can dump more heat into case.
Better to make CPU heatsink fan increase speed according to CPU temperature and use temperature sensor at least partially for controlling speed of case fans.
(of course case affects to what kind fan configuration/grouping is good)

Beyond PWM in all four channels output power per channel is higher 2,5A/30W without any heatsink and voltage drop lower.
https://forum.aquacomputer.de/weitere-foren/english-forum/103573-new-aquaero-6/
 
Back
Top Bottom