MX-1 was always better than AS5 in reviews, but to do a propper review, there will have to be a crazy ammount of re-mounts to get a decent average, so there's only gong to be a degree or 2 difference.
The better performers are probably the pastes that are actually easier to spread, getting a better, thinner spread.
An ideal world would see no paste, but it's almost physically impossible to get 2 100% flat surfaces without the use of NASA style equipment.
Tuniq t-X2 has been performing pretty well recently, might be an idea to give that a try.
I would also try the spreading method rather than the blob, i've found that i get better temps with the spread - I know on the arctic silver webby it says to spread a line across the IHS, but there is only one reason why they say this: n00bs...
The average pc user generally won't have a clue what they are on about if they went into detail about spreading it in a nice thin layer to reduce the ammount of paste etc etc, so they tell them to chuck a great stonking line of paste across the core and hope for the best (average user wont be clocking and looking for that extra 0.01% of performance like a lot of us on here, and thus the couple of extra degrees won't bother them...)