• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Are Nvidia Going to Support Freesync?

Gregster said:
The way you are going on, I assumed you were desperate for GPU PhysX and felt you were being harshly treated by not getting it when you got your AMD GPUs. I will have to assume you didn't know that GPU PhysX runs on nVidia GPUs only when you purchased your 290s and therefore, you only have yourself to blame for buying wrongly and not researching.
Click to expand...

LOL
What makes you think 290 was my only GPU's I have ever owned? FYI I have owned Nvidia also..
 
I find it a fallacy to find any title to have an AMD or Nvidia brand. I just see them as games, and buy them as such.
I always found it funny when the DOW 2 "sponsorship" or whatever you want to call it, originally having like Nvidia on it, and then changing to AMD.
 
Right, I am off to the Ferrari forums to whinge at them because my Vauxhall Astra only has 100BHP and I am missing out :D

Joking aside, have a good Christmas everyone and hope you get what you want. I am off to the pub to get smashed :D:p
 
Have a pernod and blackcurrant for me, Greg. Hope you had a nice birthday the other day, too? :)

Have a nice time all. :)
 
Last edited:
Gerard said:
And according to amd they had discussions with nvidia and behind the scenes they were told it wasn't happening despite the public offering. So who do you believe?
Click to expand...

In that instance Nvidia as AMD has sued Intel and Nvidia for far less so the idea that AMD's story is true but they didn't call the lawyers is comical.
 
melmac said:
People corrected you before about this, yet you are back posting the sane drivel. Freesync is AMD's method to connect to an adaptive sync monitor.

Gsync monitors cost more because Nvidia has to supply hardware specific to that monitor. Its not a license fee. There will always be a price difference between adaptive sync and gsync monitors unless nvidia supply the gsync module for free. They are a business, they aren't going to do that.

You clearly know nothing about gsync/freesync or adaptive sync, so please stop posting such rubbish. Mind you there are lots of other posters in this thread who don't have a clue either.
Click to expand...

Adaptive sync requires hardware, AMD put it in the graphics card, Nvidia have it in the monitor.

there is no free lunch:rolleyes:
 
shankly1985 said:
You said they isn't a PhysX only title.. You wrong every title with PhysX in is PhysX only title.



You reply
There also isn't a PhysX only title or a Gsync only title.

So what Finial8y is saying is true, Any game running Mantle no gamer is at loss because they can simply use DX11 and still enjoy the same experiance as the game intended..

I with AMD GPU play a PhysX enabled game I loose out on features They is no changing back to another Physics API to get the same benefit like you can with DX11..

Anyway back on topic!
Click to expand...


What complete idiocy.

Every game that support PhysX is perfectly playable by every AMD owner. Of course AMD owners don't get to benefit form the proprietary technology that Nvidia supplies to its owners.

That is as retarded as saying every game that supports True Audio is a AMD TrueAudio only title. Of course Nvidia user don't get the benefits of TrueAudio, it only exists on AMD hardware.

Games like iv that support mantle offer multi-gpu modes and and AA odes not available on Nvidiad hardware, so are all mantle Games AMD only?

How the heck do you expect it to be any different? AMD don't license Physx technology, therefore AMD users don't get to experience that in games.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom