Are these science books worth reading?

Permabanned
Joined
29 Apr 2012
Posts
498
  • Why Does E=mc2: (Any Why Should We Care?) by Brian Cox
  • A Short History of Nearly Everything by Bill Bryson
  • Just Six Numbers: The Deep Forces That Shape the Universe by Martin J. Rees

Thanks.
 
I personally found them very good, took me a while to work my way through them all as I had to revisit sections in each book.
 
I found Why Does E=mc2 a little dry. To me, it started easy enough, and then ramped up quite quickly, so I ended up re-reading earlier parts to try and catch up.

On the flip side, A Short History of Nearly Everything is just brilliant. Very entertaining. It is almost not a science book, cause the stories he tells for the history of science are very interesting.
 
Last edited:
I can personally vouch for a Short History of Nearly Everything. Nothing short of brilliant. Think I must've read it about 5 times already. Highly entertaining and informative.
 
  • Why Does E=mc2: (Any Why Should We Care?) by Brian Cox
  • A Short History of Nearly Everything by Bill Bryson
  • Just Six Numbers: The Deep Forces That Shape the Universe by Martin J. Rees

Thanks.

Brilliant books.

Really, really enjoyed 'A Short History of Nearly Everything' I've got a physical copy, the audio book and it on my kindle :)

The other two are very good, the Cox one took me a while.
 
I also enjoyed "Thirteen things that doen't make sense". Some odd bits but overall very though provoking stuff.
 
I read a short history of nearly everything, its one of those books that lends itself not to read from start to finish but reading specific segments at a time.

I read it from start to finish and I just got overloaded with information! So yeah, more of a reference book.
 
Just reading Atomic by Jim Baggot at the moment, basically an in depth history behind the nations/people/science/technology/espionage involved in creating the fission and fusion bombs.
 
Back
Top Bottom