• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Arg! I should learn to read :(

Caporegime
Joined
9 May 2004
Posts
28,744
Location
Leafy outskirts of London
Not the first time I have done this:

See cheap retail cpu.
Decide to get OEM and aftermarket cooler.
Chip arrives, and I see that it is not the same core as the retail one was :(

So I have a 3000+ Winchester instead of the Venice I assumed I would be getting.

Is there a huge difference between these 2 cores?

I was hoping to stick him in a K8N Neo4 and get about 2.4Ghz, which I know I could with a Venice.
 
krooton said:
Not the first time I have done this:

See cheap retail cpu.
Decide to get OEM and aftermarket cooler.
Chip arrives, and I see that it is not the same core as the retail one was :(

So I have a 3000+ Winchester instead of the Venice I assumed I would be getting.

Is there a huge difference between these 2 cores?

I was hoping to stick him in a K8N Neo4 and get about 2.4Ghz, which I know I could with a Venice.

No idea, sorry.
 
Mattus said:
I got 2.4 out of my Winchester 3200 on stock volts. Give it a go, if not, there's always the 'bay...

Well, 2.4 isn't an absolute needed, I just thought I could do a somewhat beefy upgrade on my gf's machine, as a 2.4 3000+ would trump a 2.2 XP2400M quite a bit.

I'll be happy with 2.2 I guess.
 
I'd say you could get 2.4 relatively easily, the older Newcastles were usually good for 2.5 and higher so with a newer revision core it shouldn't be a problem.
My mate has his 3000 at 2.3 with no voltage increases or anything, he hasn't tried for higher either. I seem to remember people getting some really good clocks on them here when they first came out too. (Over 2.6ghz)
Shouldn't be that much worse than the Venice if 2.4 is ideally where you wanted to be.
 
In terms of overclocking there's probably not much in it, not enough to worry about any way. And it will vary from chip to chip any way.

The venice cores have SSE3 though, where as the Winchesters only have SSE2.
But that's not a big deal either.

Edit - My 3200 Winchester went to 2.6GHz on quiet cooling. That was with a voltage bump, but I can't remember how much though.
 
The $6m Dan said:
In terms of overclocking there's probably not much in it, not enough to worry about any way. And it will vary from chip to chip any way.

The venice cores have SSE3 though, where as the Winchesters only have SSE2.
But that's not a big deal either.

Edit - My 3200 Winchester went to 2.6GHz on quiet cooling. That was with a voltage bump, but I can't remember how much though.

Well, I got an Akasa AK-860, as quiet is more important that cool, so I'm hoping to get something decent on stock volts.

Cheers all :)
 
Had two that did 2.6Ghz, not stock volts though, can't remember how much. Had about 4 other 3200+'s and they were poor clockers, don't think i got over 2.4 from them with mucho volts.
 
Back
Top Bottom