How does GN know of every CPU failure?
Well as much as I dislike the guy, over at GN he seemed to make an attempt to collate all the data regarding this issue some time back with some facts and figures from manufacturers and the forum claims instead of wildly claiming they are dying left right and center after reading some Reddit users blaming Asrock for every problem they have with AMD.
Regardless, the fact is Asrock are not blowing up CPU's left right center. The number seems to be anything between 200 to 1000. Unconfirmed and it seems people are assuming its all Asrock and their fault because forums users say so, as we see, one reply here already lists one dealers 15 failures out of 150 CPU's used by one company, yet that was on Asus motherboards before the recent Asus issue was highlighted. 15 out of 150 could simply have been a bad batch from AMD, but 10% of your CPU purchases failing in an occasional batch, who do you blame? AMD or Asus, no wait add it to the Asrock phenomenon!
It seems simply anything goes wrong then it's best to assume the Asrock motherboard even if its a different brand.
AMD 9000 series CPU's seem to have had a problem or two, we see that in the claimed batch failure rates for 2024/2025. Add to that the fact that the AMD CPU failure rate is actually higher than the failure rate of an AMD CPU due to Asrock. And at one point AMD were keen to try and claim any form of overclocking CPU and memory such as PBO or EXPO would invalidate the warranties too before redacting the point, with that in mind it would seem the CPU's being pushed to the limit by AMD and not quite as consistent and robust as we would like.
If Asrock only sold two milllion motherboards and had around 200 failures that was 0.01%, even if sales has stopped dead at 2 million, with a claimed 1000 failures that would be 0.05% failure rate. Asrock have sold far more than 2 million AM5 motherboards at this point.
To quote the Goggle regarding AMD CPU failure percentages, data from major retailers suggests a low overall RMA rate of 0.56% to 1.1%, indicating, for most users, the processor is reliable.
Well if 0.56% to 1.1% is reliable, then the Asrock failure rate is a Godlike reliability and best in class at 0.05%, even if we have 1000 failures on Asrock.
It's like stating your at least 10x more likely to have an AMD CPU in general fail overall regardless of motherboard, than experience an ASrock motherboard fail the CPU. If anything it could be that faulty AMD CPU's are the issue possibly damaging motherboards. Why not, you cannot claim Asrock are to blame for everything if their CPU kill rate is 0.05% and AMD's return a dead CPU rate is 0.5% to 1.1%.
What is the most common motherboard failure when a CPU starts failing. VRM's. Maybe this issue is AMD CPU faults making the Asrock instable.
So if the failure rate of a 9800X3D is at best 0.56%, the simple math points out that the majority of failed CPU's in Asrock motherboards are due to AMD CPU's having issues and not the motherboard. Like nine out of ten due to the AMD failure rate and one out of ten due to the Asrock failure rate. Simplified, but isn't everything.
To put the average 0.56% figure into context.
If 0.56% of two million 9800X3D's failed. That is 11200 dead CPU's due to the CPU manufacturer.
If 0.05% of two million 9800X3D were fried by a motherboard. That is 1000 dead CPU's due to the MB manufacturer.
So with those rough around the edges figures, for every 1000 CPU's Asrock kills, AMD kills 11200 CPU's.
What are the odds that based on such figures, you may experience an AMD failure in an Asrock motherboard due to AMD's failure rate, but assume it's Asrock to blame because people on Reddit think 1000 is a problem, 11200 is not.
So if you would not touch Asrock's 0.05% with a bargepole, why would you touch AMD with their own 0.56% to 1.1% figure?
Looking forward to the Day Asrock and AMD actually find out what was going on and tel lthe consumers it's resolved.