![[timko]](/styles/overclockers/avatars/5.png){kind=avatar}
I was browsing a few tech sites and saw this one linked...
http://www.bit-tech.net/hardware/monitors/2009/02/06/the-dark-side-of-overdrive/1
I'm sure lot of people here will know everything that this article covers but it's a reasonable read for those less in the know.
Anyway, I was reading through the lag measurement section and was scratching my head as to why he chose to use two lcds rather than a CRT + LCD combo. He does eventually admit that the Dell 30inch has around 10ms lag over a CRT but it just seems he wants to demonstrate how bad the input lag on the Samsung 244T is in comparison to the Dell rather than focus on the larger picture (no pun intended).
http://www.bit-tech.net/hardware/monitors/2009/02/06/the-dark-side-of-overdrive/1
I'm sure lot of people here will know everything that this article covers but it's a reasonable read for those less in the know.
Anyway, I was reading through the lag measurement section and was scratching my head as to why he chose to use two lcds rather than a CRT + LCD combo. He does eventually admit that the Dell 30inch has around 10ms lag over a CRT but it just seems he wants to demonstrate how bad the input lag on the Samsung 244T is in comparison to the Dell rather than focus on the larger picture (no pun intended).