Ashes of the Singularity Bench

ALXAndy · 4 Sep 2015 at 16:55

fs123 said:
So it's possible to modify stuff in some config file that doesn't show up in the screenshots? Then it would make these benchmark comparisons null and void.

You can set the settings but they don't change, even after rebooting the game.

It's broken, basically.

muziqaz · 4 Sep 2015 at 16:58

fs123 said:
So it's possible to modify stuff in some config file that doesn't show up in the screenshots? Then it would make these benchmark comparisons null and void.

Not really, what I meant, it is possible to do it within game, and not tell anyone and get away with it, since everything still point to you using settings you pretend to use

Like using xfire/sli to boost framerate a bit (if game does not crash that is), and it does not report in result screen, and Temporal AA can be disabled in game, and benchmark still reports it as enabled. I never tried other settings, but it wouldn't surprise me if other settings are bugged as well and are not reported correctly in results menu.

As I said any results run by different people are useless, since we cannot guarantee the honesty of each individual

TheRealDeal · 4 Sep 2015 at 17:06

fs123 said:
So it's possible to modify stuff in some config file that doesn't show up in the screenshots? Then it would make these benchmark comparisons null and void.

I would say there's a certain level of trust around here but if things look off they usually are. Even then i would say it's not on purpose.

fs123 · 4 Sep 2015 at 17:06

I see. This could explain why a 980Ti is beating the TitanX's at pretty much the same clocks/cpu configurations. The Temporal AA is major performance hog so maybe it's not working on the 980Ti test result. This thread needs to be put on stasis until Oxide get a proper benchmark out or we can verify everyone's settings properly. If AoTS is anything like the Starswarm test there should be some log file with results data in it.

muziqaz · 4 Sep 2015 at 17:09

fs123 said:
I see. This could explain why a 980Ti is beating the TitanX's at pretty much the same clocks/cpu configurations. The Temporal AA is major performance hog so maybe it's not working on the 980Ti test result.

I think Andy was complaining about his settings reverting and him having issues with setting the right one. Maybe one of the settings got stuck or something. Anything is possible.
I think we can all agree that his 1080p run should be void, or maybe he really has some epic 980ti and he is just lying to is about how much he locked it

and cpu probably is under LN2 as well

Streetlight · 4 Sep 2015 at 17:38

muziqaz said:
I wonder what your card would post with decently clocked Haswell E

Team AMD!!!...

Plus my titan-x's love my haswell E

muziqaz · 4 Sep 2015 at 17:52

Streetlight said:
Team AMD!!!...

Plus my titan-x's love my haswell E

The thing is, 5Ghz AMD cpu is nothing to sneeze at, but in this benchmark somehow AMD cpus are completely underperforming. I hope that AMD and Oxide are looking into it, and will sort it out.

My fury xs love my haswell e as well, but the minute I see Zen being decent CPU that love will disappear very quickly

humbug · 4 Sep 2015 at 18:09

How are you guys getting screenshots from DX12? i'm using Shadowplay to record the results screen.

Initial run.

GTX 970 @ 1450/1900
FX-9590 @ 4.6Ghz

DX11

DX12

Gregster · 4 Sep 2015 at 18:24

Print screen and paint lol

humbug · 4 Sep 2015 at 18:27

Actually, you what Kaap, use this one instead

humbug said:
How are you guys getting screenshots from DX12? i'm using Shadowplay to record the results screen.

Initial run.

GTX 970 @ 1450/1900
FX-9590 @ 4.6Ghz

DX11

DX12

mnc fear · 4 Sep 2015 at 18:29

Where can I download the Benchmark - I cant seem to find it anywhere

Thanks

Gregster · 4 Sep 2015 at 18:30

mnc fear said:
Where can I download the Benchmark - I cant seem to find it anywhere

Thanks

You have to buy it. $45 from Stardock.

muziqaz · 4 Sep 2015 at 18:33

Gregster said:
Print screen and paint lol

haha, yes, except paint. GIMP for me

muziqaz · 4 Sep 2015 at 18:36

humbug said:
Actually, you what Kaap, use this one instead

TAA disabled?

humbug · 4 Sep 2015 at 18:38

muziqaz said:
TAA disabled?

Wait, what? how dare you....

muziqaz · 4 Sep 2015 at 18:45

humbug said:
Wait, what? how dare you....

what I would suggest: either delete this thread or lock it, till Oxide fixes it, or re create it again and for settings set it on high with TAA disabled. Obviously that will not be optimal since we want our e-pen to run everything at max, but well, if we want something comparable and honest, we can try

andybird123 · 4 Sep 2015 at 18:47

I would vote for settings that aren't bugged then, "high" preset, might also make it more inclusive of people with cards that aren't the highest tier

I've just run doing the exact same process street describes and gotten 37, 39 and 42, so take the lowest if you like

Gregster · 4 Sep 2015 at 18:50

andybird123 said:
I would vote for settings that aren't bugged then, "high" preset, might also make it more inclusive of people with cards that aren't the highest tier

Agreed, "high" preset and nothing added or removed.

humbug · 4 Sep 2015 at 18:50

muziqaz said:
what I would suggest: either delete this thread or lock it, till Oxide fixes it, or re create it again and for settings set it on high with TAA disabled. Obviously that will not be optimal since we want our e-pen to run everything at max, but well, if we want something comparable and honest, we can try

Sadly as it is some people are going to abuse it. Lock until they fix the hidden setting shenanigans.

andybird123 · 4 Sep 2015 at 19:03

why is everyone else running v0.49?