Think there are a few different build by the looks of it, that'll screw the results some what
-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Ashes of the Singularity Bench
- Thread starter Kaapstad
- Start date
Think there are a few different build by the looks of it, that'll screw the results some what
Soldato
- Joined
- 30 Nov 2011
- Posts
- 11,376
how did you do it - at least tell kaap so that he can try with some other settings and see if something else, e.g. the high preset, can't be bugged
Caporegime
I suspect its the same way you did it, i have already sent him an Email explaining how to do it.
Caporegime
Because Humbug hasn't bought the game I suspect.
Soldato
- Joined
- 30 Nov 2011
- Posts
- 11,376
you really think if I was trying to cheat that I'd make it so obvious?
knowing there are plenty of people on here with faster CPU's and GPU's than me
His is the same version as kaps and ALXAndy ! They not buy it ether ?
ALX just said as much, yes
Caporegime
His is the same version as kaps and ALXAndy ! They not buy it ether ?
Probably not lol
Soldato
I doubt anyone was cheating. The settings page is buggy at best and should be expected for a pre-alpha game.
funny you should say that, since nvidians need to heavily OC their cards to beat Fury x
marketing spiel my ***.
P.S. and all I see is substantially more expensive titan x clocked very high beating furyx.
I would love to see Kaap clocking his Titan to 1400mhz levels and running 4k again, but he has 2 more threads on his cpu even though they are clocked lower
P.P.S. this was run with 4xMSAA, while all 'marketers' were running Oxide recommended 1xMSAA.
Last edited:
Soldato
- Joined
- 14 Feb 2011
- Posts
- 7,490
No need to worry.... The Fury X is an Overclockers dream.
1400-1450mhz isn't that heavy for a 980Ti/Titan, mine is about 1300mhz stock.. and the Fury X's are overclocked too. Either way with all the hype about asynchronous shaders why isn't Fury 20% faster? with the marketing we've been hearing lately you'd expect NVidia to be 25% slower regardless of overclock.
Last edited:
No need to worry.... The Fury X is an Overclockers dream.
As I said before, we do not need to clock fury x sky high to be able to get performance edge
so please keep those old and boring jokes to yourselfoh, ok, so please tell everyone here who are running those clocks, to overclock more. Please. FFS, if your precious nvidia clocks much higher, why would everyone run this bench at minimum(according to you) overclocks?
They are free to unleash the power of overclocking aren't they?
Fury oced? at stock voltages? please
Soldato
- Joined
- 14 Feb 2011
- Posts
- 7,490
As I said before, we do not need to clock fury x sky high to be able to get performance edge
Boring to you maybe! Has me in stitches
Soldato
- Joined
- 14 Feb 2011
- Posts
- 7,490
