• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Ashes of the Singularity Bench

andybird123 said:
how did you do it - at least tell kaap so that he can try with some other settings and see if something else, e.g. the high preset, can't be bugged
Click to expand...

I suspect its the same way you did it, i have already sent him an Email explaining how to do it.
 
humbug said:
I suspect its the same way you did it, i have already sent him an Email explaining how to do it.
Click to expand...

you really think if I was trying to cheat that I'd make it so obvious?
knowing there are plenty of people on here with faster CPU's and GPU's than me :rolleyes:

pete910 said:
:confused:

His is the same version as kaps and ALXAndy ! They not buy it ether ?
Click to expand...

ALX just said as much, yes
 
Single TitanX @1471/2002
5960X @4.5
DX11
355.60 Drivers
1080p

owrYuji.jpg


pObkWR5.jpg
 
Kaap, do you mind adding my runs with different clocks? Or are you in the process of doing that already? :D You ninja editing your 1st posts :DDD
 
Last edited:
How come the Fury X results so far are 20% slower? what happened to all of the marketing spiel about asynchronous shaders?
 
mmj_uk said:
How come the Fury X results so far are 20% slower? what happened to all of the marketing spiel about asynchronous shaders?
Click to expand...

funny you should say that, since nvidians need to heavily OC their cards to beat Fury x ;)
marketing spiel my ***.

P.S. and all I see is substantially more expensive titan x clocked very high beating furyx.
I would love to see Kaap clocking his Titan to 1400mhz levels and running 4k again, but he has 2 more threads on his cpu even though they are clocked lower ;)

P.P.S. this was run with 4xMSAA, while all 'marketers' were running Oxide recommended 1xMSAA.
 
Last edited:
1400-1450mhz isn't that heavy for a 980Ti/Titan, mine is about 1300mhz stock.. and the Fury X's are overclocked too. Either way with all the hype about asynchronous shaders why isn't Fury 20% faster? with the marketing we've been hearing lately you'd expect NVidia to be 25% slower regardless of overclock.
 
Last edited:
mmj_uk said:
1400-1450mhz isn't heavy for a 980Ti and the Fury X's are overclocked too.
Click to expand...

oh, ok, so please tell everyone here who are running those clocks, to overclock more. Please. FFS, if your precious nvidia clocks much higher, why would everyone run this bench at minimum(according to you) overclocks?
They are free to unleash the power of overclocking aren't they?
Fury oced? at stock voltages? please :D
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom