5 Dec 2008 at 09:06 #1 embalse embalse Associate Joined 13 Jun 2007 Posts 1,106 Location Dorset I appologies if this has already been posted, but I can't see an answer. Is there a reason why the Asus Eee PC 1000 linux have SSD hard drives and the XP have SATA drives. It would be nice to see the XP version with SSD.
I appologies if this has already been posted, but I can't see an answer. Is there a reason why the Asus Eee PC 1000 linux have SSD hard drives and the XP have SATA drives. It would be nice to see the XP version with SSD.
5 Dec 2008 at 17:18 #3 embalse embalse Associate OP Joined 13 Jun 2007 Posts 1,106 Location Dorset YorkshirePadd26 said: To put it simply, COST SSD are expensive to make and normal SATA HD's are far cheaper, corners somewhere have to be cut to pay for the Windows Licence Click to expand... In that case you would expect the Linux to be cheaper than the XP, but they are more expensive.
YorkshirePadd26 said: To put it simply, COST SSD are expensive to make and normal SATA HD's are far cheaper, corners somewhere have to be cut to pay for the Windows Licence Click to expand... In that case you would expect the Linux to be cheaper than the XP, but they are more expensive.